Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line graph shows the total number of drivers who have been fined bya the speen camera, and the number of individuals who has been died in a road accident in 8 years. And the table give the information about the people's opinions on speed cameras.

Overall, the people eho has been fined on over speeding has increased with the passage of time, and the people who were died with road accident are fluctuated between 3,000 and 3,500 in eight-years. The survey shows that the majority are unhappy with the instalation of speed cameras.

The speed camera fines are constantly increasing, but after the 5th year the dramatic rise has been shown in the graph. The number of road accident fatalities were minor fluctuation between 3,000 and 3,500 across the year.

The survey shows, that majority think that with instalation of speed camera did't reduces the number of accidents on road, they believe that deployment of speed cameras is just to rise revenue and the majority think that their are too many speed cameras on the road.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt by describing the main trends in the line graphs and summarising the survey tables. An overview is present, highlighting the general upward trend in fines and the fluctuations in fatalities. However, some parts are more fully developed than others, and certain details are slightly imprecise. For instance, the discussion of the survey results relies on generalisations rather than citing specific percentages provided in the tables. To reach a higher level, the response would need to select and highlight key data points from both the graphs and the tables more thoroughly and present a more fully developed, detailed overview.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The report has a coherent overall arrangement, dividing information logically into an introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs focusing on the visual data and survey results respectively. Paragraphing is utilised to separate distinct topics. However, cohesion is at times mechanical or faulty. The progression between sentences can feel disjointed due to limited linking phrases, and referencing is not always clear, which slightly disrupts the flow of the text. To improve further, the writer should employ a wider range of cohesive devices more naturally and ensure smoother transitions between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the writer to communicate basic trends and survey opinions. There are attempts to use less common vocabulary, such as 'fluctuated', 'installation', and 'deployment'. However, there are notable spelling errors and word choice inaccuracies throughout the text, including 'speen' for speed, 'eho' for who, 'over speeding' for speeding, 'instalation' for installation, and 'rise' instead of raise. These lexical errors do not completely impede communication, but they restrict the score because they demonstrate inconsistent control over word forms and spelling.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over basic sentence structures. However, there are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation that persist throughout the text. Examples include subject-verb agreement errors ('the number of individuals who has been died'), article misuse ('bya the speen camera'), incorrect passive/active verb forms ('were died', 'did't reduces'), and punctuation issues such as comma splices. While the meaning is generally understandable despite these errors, the high frequency of grammatical slips prevents the response from achieving a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.