Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-03

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line graphs shows the information about speed camera fines and casualties by accident on roads in Britain across an eight-year period after the speed cameras were introduced. The survey reveals the public's opinion on speed cameras.

Overall, it is crystal clear that the views of the public on speed cameras are mostly negative. The number of speed camera fines increased rapidly across the eight years but the number of road accident fatalities had no significant change.

Having a quick glance, it is vivid that after the introduction of speed cameras the number of people fined for speeding increased rapidly. In year 1, the number of fines were 200,000 , this number tripled in just 4 years and by year 8 it reached 1.6 million. Conversly, the number of deaths caused by road accidents remained stable over the time period.

Moving towards the survey, 60% of people thought that speed cameras had no effect on reducing the number of accidents. An overwhelmimg 71% of people reported that speed cameras were installed to generate revenue while only a quarter said that it was to improve road safety. A majority of people thought that there were too many speed cameras on the roads.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, successfully presenting an overview of both the line graphs and the survey data. The main trends and prominent features are adequately covered, such as the rapid rise in speed camera fines alongside the stable number of road fatalities. The survey findings are also summarised, noting public perceptions regarding accident reduction, revenue generation, and camera density. However, some areas are slightly under-developed; for instance, the description of the survey results relies on listing percentages without fully synthesizing the broader implications, which keeps this criterion balanced between adequate coverage and partial depth.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response maintains a coherent overall arrangement with a clear logical progression from the introductory summary to the main trends in the line graphs and finally the survey data. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate different aspects of the visual data. Cohesive devices are employed to link ideas, such as 'Overall', 'Having a quick glance', and 'Moving towards the survey', though some of these transitional phrases feel slightly mechanical or formulaic. Referencing is mostly clear, though minor improvements in cohesion would make the flow more natural and seamless throughout the text.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

An adequate range of vocabulary is deployed for the task, allowing the student to successfully discuss data trends and survey statistics. There are successful attempts to use less common vocabulary items such as 'fatalities', 'stable', 'revenue', and 'overwhelming'. However, occasional lexical inaccuracies and spelling slips occur, such as 'Conversly' instead of 'Conversely', and minor stylistic awkwardness in phrases like 'casualties by accident on roads'. These errors do not impede communication, but they reflect a typical profile where lexical control is sufficient yet requires greater precision for higher bands.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writing demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, incorporating relative clauses and passive constructions effectively. There is good control over basic structures, and punctuation is generally handled well. However, some grammatical errors are present, such as subject-verb agreement issues (e.g., 'The line graphs shows' instead of 'show', and 'the number of fines were' instead of 'was'). While these errors occur, they are relatively infrequent and rarely impede communication, allowing the overall grammatical performance to fit comfortably within the expected level.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.