Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The line grpahs illustrate the amount of drivers in Britain fined by speed cameras for driving over the speed limit, and the number of fatalities occured by road accidents, over a time period of 8 years since speed cameras have been installed. The tables depict the outcomes of a survey on how people thought of speed cameras.

Overall, even though there is a staggering increase in the number of drivers violating the speed limit, the number of deaths caused by road accidents remain almost unchanged.

From the graph, it is clear that the lowest number of people penalized for speeding is in the first year, with approximately a figure of 200,000. This number kept increasing throughout the years and reached a peak of nearly 1,600,000 lately. The number of fatalities reamined in a consistent figure of more than 3000 deaths per year throughout the time frame except for the 4th year, where it declined to nearly less than 3000.

The survey reflects the opinion of the mass regarding the speed camera issue. Most people have negative overview of speed cameras, and their role in reducing accidents. Their primary thought of speed camera installation is revenue raise.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover the main components of the visuals and provide a clear overview: fines rose sharply, while fatalities stayed broadly stable. The figures of about 200,000 in the first year and 1.6 million in the final year are accurate, and you correctly identify revenue as the leading perceived reason for installing cameras. This meets the task well, with some features described more fully than others. The account of fatalities is imprecise: they did not fall below 3,000 in year four, and the series fluctuated around 3,100–3,350. More importantly, the survey summary omits the key percentages and the finding that 60% did not think cameras reduce accidents; “negative overview” is too broad. Include these comparisons and a few supporting figures to make the report more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, a concise overview, a paragraph on the graphs, and a final paragraph on the survey. This makes the main progression easy to follow, and phrases such as “Overall” and “From the graph” help signal shifts. However, the final paragraph compresses several survey findings into general statements, so the relationship between opinions on accident reduction, the purpose of cameras, and their number is not clearly developed. The reference “This number” is understandable but could be more precise, and the report would benefit from linking the survey details with clear comparisons rather than relying on broad summaries. More explicit sequencing and comparison would make cohesion more flexible and less dependent on basic signposting.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range for describing trends and opinions, including “staggering increase,” “reached a peak,” “consistent,” and “primary thought.” Some choices show an attempt to use more formal or varied language, but several are inaccurate or unnatural, which limits precision. For example, “amount of drivers” is less suitable than “number of drivers,” “fatalities occured by road accidents” is an awkward collocation, and “revenue raise” should be “raising revenue.” “Negative overview” does not clearly express the survey result; “negative view” or a specific statement about respondents’ opinions would be clearer. There are also spelling errors such as “grpahs” and “reamined.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling, especially in key terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a concessive overview beginning “even though” and a relative clause in “where it declined.” Meaning is generally clear, and the errors do not prevent the reader from following the report. Some grammatical inaccuracies remain, however. In “the number of deaths … remain,” the singular subject requires “remains”; “how people thought of speed cameras” would be more naturally formed as “what people thought about speed cameras”; and “the lowest number … is in the first year” shifts into the present tense when describing past data. The sentence about fatalities also has an unclear construction around “except for the 4th year.” Use consistent past-tense reporting and check subject–verb agreement and sentence structure to improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.