Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The graph illustrates the peoples involved in driving too harsh in Britain after the installment of the safety cameras that interprets the total of the death over the duration of eight long time period. The analysemen had been done seperating into three categories about the benefits of installment.

Overall,there had not been seen any improvement into the fall of accidents although the security cameras had been installed. It shows that the changes cannnot be brought through camera process, instead a proper planning, rules and strict regulations should be implied.

Eight years of datas displayed the negative rise of fines rising from 200,000 to 1,600,000 along with the fluctuation of accidents and death counts around 3000 to 3500. Although the main motive of implicating cameras were to declined the vehicles speed and the accidents but the survey doesnot support its motive. Instead the survey showed only 32% pupils agreed accidents were declined whereas 60% pupils denied and 8% of people were unaware.

Likely 26% accepted its pros toward improvement of road safety but 71% believed main moto was to rised revenue. Partially 56% agreed on large numbers of camera installment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main contrast: fines rise sharply from about 200,000 to 1.6 million, while fatalities fluctuate around 3,000–3,500, and you report the key survey finding that most respondents did not think cameras reduce accidents. This gives the report relevant coverage of both charts and the survey. However, the overview is partly evaluative rather than a clear summary of the data: the claim that “proper planning, rules and strict regulations should be implied” is advice not shown in the visuals. Some survey information is also incomplete: you omit the responses on whether camera numbers were “too few” or “about right,” and the 56% result is described vaguely. Select the main patterns and report all three survey topics more precisely, without adding recommendations.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic paragraph structure, moving from an introduction and overview to the graph trends and then survey results. This helps the reader recognise the broad sections. However, progression within paragraphs is not always clear, and some links are awkward or repetitive. For example, “Although the main motive … but the survey does not support its motive” uses conflicting connectors, while “Likely” does not clearly signal how the final survey figures relate to the previous point. The opening also combines several ideas in a confusing sentence. Use one clear overview, then organise the body into the graph data and the survey findings, with straightforward transitions such as “Regarding the survey” and “By contrast.”

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “fluctuation,” “improvement,” “revenue” and “road safety,” so the reader can generally identify the subject. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or unnatural, sometimes making meaning difficult to follow. Phrases such as “peoples involved in driving too harsh,” “the analysemen,” “negative rise of fines,” and “main moto” do not express the intended ideas clearly. There are also spelling and word-form errors, including “seperating,” “cannnot” and “rised.” Aim for accurate, conventional report language rather than complex-sounding substitutions: for example, describe the number of drivers caught speeding, the number of fatalities, and the proportion of respondents who held each view.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast with “Although” and a sentence beginning “whereas.” However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences hard to interpret. In “The graph illustrates the peoples involved … that interprets the total of the death,” the clause structure and agreement are unclear. “Although the main motive … but …” incorrectly combines two contrasting conjunctions, and “the survey showed only 32% pupils agreed” is missing a grammatical link between the percentage and the people. Articles, plurals and verb forms also need attention. Build accuracy with shorter sentences first, then add one correctly formed subordinate clause at a time.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.