Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The graphs below gives information on the number of drivers who have been caught by speed cameras while they were speeding on roads in Britain, along with the total number of fatalities that took place during road accidents over a period of eight years. Furthermore, the table below presents the data of a survey regarding people's viewpoint on speed cameras.

Overall, over a period of 8 years, the number of speed camera fines increased without a trace of decline. Along with this, the number of road accidents remained steady. Furthermore, the survery depicts that the public is unsatisfied from the speed cameras, due to them providing no benefit whatsoever.

Ever since speed camera were installed eight years ago, the number of people fined for speeding increased overtime instead of declining, showing a drastic rise in the number of fines from year 6 and onwards to year 8. In addition to this, the number of accident didn't decrease. It remained steady throughout the 8 years, hovering between 3000 to 3500.

Furthermore, the survey also shows that people are not pleased with the speed cameras. Majority of people diagree that speed cameras have reduces the number of accidents. They believe the primary reason behind it was just to make extra revenue. Along with this, they also state that theere are too many speed cameras on the road.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both the charts and the survey, and your overview identifies the main contrast: fines rose substantially while fatalities stayed broadly stable. You also report the survey’s general scepticism about cameras. These are relevant features, and the rise from year 6 to year 8 is correctly highlighted. However, some claims are too broad or stronger than the data supports: fatalities did not simply remain steady, but fluctuated between roughly 3,100 and 3,350, and the survey does not establish that cameras provide “no benefit whatsoever.” The survey findings would be clearer with key figures, such as 60% saying cameras do not reduce accidents and 71% believing revenue is the main reason. More precise reporting and a less absolute overview would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The report has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the charts and survey. The sequence is easy to follow, and linking phrases such as “Furthermore” and “In addition to this” help connect points. However, these transitions are somewhat repetitive, and the final two paragraphs rely on a list-like progression rather than developing comparisons. The overview also combines the chart trends with a broad judgement about public dissatisfaction, which makes the main findings less precise. Grouping the survey results around the three questions, and using clearer references to the relevant percentages, would improve progression. Overall, the organisation is coherent, though some cohesion is mechanical and could be more varied.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “fatalities,” “survey,” “revenue,” and “hovering,” and the meaning is generally understandable. There is some attempt at more formal reporting language, but several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or informal: “unsatisfied from” should be “dissatisfied with,” “viewpoint” is less natural here than “opinions,” and “make extra revenue” would be better expressed as “raise revenue.” Spelling errors such as “survery,” “diagree,” and “theere” are noticeable, while “no benefit whatsoever” is an overly emphatic phrase for an objective report. Aim for precise, neutral vocabulary and check spelling carefully; this would make the range you already attempt more effective.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “while,” “along with,” and “that,” and the overall meaning is usually clear. However, some errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction remain. For example, “The graphs below gives” should be “The graphs below give,” “speed camera were installed” needs plural agreement, and “the number of accident didn't decrease” requires a plural noun. In “people have reduces,” the verb form is incorrect; use “people have reduced” or recast the sentence as “people disagree that cameras reduce accidents.” The sentence “the public is unsatisfied … due to them providing” is also awkwardly constructed. Review agreement and verb patterns, while retaining your attempts at complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.