Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The graphs illustrates the over speeding fines and related road accidents captured by speed cameras deployed in Britain for a total of 8 years timeframe.

Overall, the speed camera fines rose dramatically in following 8 years, whereas road accidents remained stable throughout the whole period.

In terms of fines, when speed cameras installed the fines was 200,000 per year, in following years numbers grown sharply to 1,600,000 in the end.

Conversely, road accidents were slightly fluctuated throughout the 8 years period. In first year the number was 3100 and in the end it was accounted for 3500.

In terms of public surveys, many people were recorded against camera installations, while a total of 60% people opposed that it has never reduced the numbers in road accidents. In addition, multiple individuals around 71% argued that this development is for revenue generation, whereas some reported that there are too many cameras on roads. However, people who don't report opinions in surveys stood at least contributing proportions.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both the charts and the survey, and your overview identifies the main contrast: fines rose substantially while fatalities were broadly stable. You also report the key survey findings that 60% did not think cameras reduced accidents and 71% believed revenue was the main reason for their installation. However, some details are inaccurate or unclear: fatalities ended at about 3,350, not 3,500, and the statement that “many people were recorded against camera installations” is too broad. The survey shows that 56% thought there were too many cameras, but 19% thought there were too few and 17% felt the number was about right. More precise coverage of these contrasting responses, and a clearer account of the fatalities’ small fluctuations, would make the report more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, two paragraphs on the charts, and a final paragraph on the survey. This makes the main information easy to locate, and transitions such as “Overall,” “Conversely,” and “In addition” help connect points. However, the progression within the survey paragraph is less clear: “many people were recorded against camera installations” does not specify which survey question is being discussed, and “However” introduces the final point without clearly identifying the contrast. Some linking phrases also feel mechanical. Grouping the survey results by question and using explicit references such as “Regarding perceived effectiveness” would make cohesion more precise and the report’s progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “remained stable,” “fluctuated,” “revenue generation,” and “proportions.” These choices help communicate the main trends and survey results. However, several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “over speeding fines,” “numbers grown sharply,” and “people were recorded against camera installations.” “Multiple individuals” is also unnatural in this context, while “stood at least contributing proportions” is difficult to understand. Aim for precise, conventional chart-report language—for example, “the number of fines increased,” “respondents,” and “accounted for.” Greater control of collocation and word forms would make your meaning clearer and more natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including the contrast in “Overall, the speed camera fines rose dramatically … whereas road accidents remained stable.” The main ideas are generally understandable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “The graphs illustrates” has subject–verb disagreement, and “when speed cameras installed” is missing an auxiliary verb. In “the fines was 200,000,” the subject and verb do not agree; “numbers grown sharply” also has an incorrect verb form. Articles and sentence construction need attention in phrases such as “in following years” and “it has never reduced the numbers.” Practise checking agreement, tense, and complete verb phrases, while retaining your attempts at varied sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.