Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The line Graph demonstrate the speed camera fines and road accident mortalities between 1 to 8 years in britain since the start of speed cameras usage for catching drivers whom do overspeeding results in plunge of road accidents.The data given in tables explain the results of a survey study on people's attitudes on speed cameras.

overall there is a increase in speed camera fines from 200,000 to 2000,000 till now.On the other hand, ther is zigzag pattern shown in road accident mortalities from 3000 to 35,00.

If we see carefully,there is steady increase in speed camera fines from 1 to 6 years,from 200,000 to 800,000 but then there is a peak line shown from 800,000 to 2000,000.Survey results of three questions shows that people agree on that the speed camera fines had decrease the number of road accident,mostly disagree and very few say do not know.Mostly people agreed on that these camera are build to increase revenue and few were in favour of it ,less then or equal to 3 percent said we donot know about this.The People opinion about number of speed cameras on raod availability varies.Most of them agree,while very low number people disagree,where as some said its right.Moreover 8 percent said we do not know about this.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify both the rising number of fines and the broadly fluctuating fatalities, and you include findings from all three survey questions. However, several key details are inaccurate or unclear. Fines rise to about 1.6 million in Year 8, not 2 million, and fatalities fluctuate around 3,100–3,350 rather than rising from 3,000 to 3,500. More importantly, the survey shows that 60% said cameras do not reduce accidents, but you write that people “agree” they had decreased them before noting disagreement. The response also lacks a clear, accurate overview of the main message across the visuals. Select the most important trends and report the survey majorities precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has some organisation: it introduces the visuals, gives an overview, and then discusses the graph and survey results. However, progression is not consistently clear, particularly where the graph description and survey summary run together in the final paragraph. Linking phrases such as “On the other hand” and “Moreover” are used, but connections between ideas are sometimes inaccurate or mechanical; for example, “On the other hand” does not clearly explain the relationship between the two trends. The survey findings would be easier to follow if grouped by question, with each result stated in a separate, logically ordered sentence. Use clearer paragraphing and refer consistently to the graph, the tables, and the survey respondents.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-related vocabulary, including “speed camera fines,” “road accident mortalities,” “steady increase,” and “zigzag pattern,” so the topic is generally identifiable. However, the range is limited and several choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to follow. For instance, “mortalities” is less suitable than “fatalities” here, “plunge of road accidents” does not accurately describe the data, and “peak line” is unclear. There are also spelling and word-form problems, such as “raod,” “donot,” and “overspeeding.” Aim for precise chart language and avoid unsupported claims: “fluctuated slightly” and “rose sharply” would describe the trends more naturally.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, including a contrast between the two graph trends and sentences describing survey results. However, errors are frequent, and some sentence structures make relationships between ideas hard to understand. Examples include “The line Graph demonstrate,” where subject–verb agreement is incorrect, and “there is a increase,” where the article is wrong. Tense and sentence construction are also inconsistent in phrases such as “the speed camera fines had decrease” and “from 1 to 6 years, from 200,000 to 800,000.” Punctuation and spacing are often unreliable, especially around commas and sentence boundaries. Practise accurate simple sentences first, then combine them with controlled clauses using “while” or “whereas.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.