Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.5)

THE CHARTS ILLUSTRATES THE NUMBER OF DRIVERS WHO HAVE BEEN CAUGHT DRIVING TOO FAST BY SPEED CAMERAS PALCED ON ROADS, AND THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE KILLED IN ROAD ACCIDENTS, OVER AN EIGHT-YEAR TIME PERIOD AS WELL AS SURVEY RESULT ON PEOPLE'S OPINIONS ON SPEED CAMERA.

OVERALL, IT IS QUITE EVIDENT THAT NUMBER OF FINES SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED, WHILST ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES FLUCTUATED MODERATELY THROUGHOUT THE PERIOD. NOTABLY, ACCODING TO SERVEY PEOPLE THINK THIS PHENOMINA ONLY BENEFICIAL FOR GOVERNMENT AND THERE ARE NOT REGISTERED ANY CHANGES IN THE NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS.

LOOKING FIRST AT FINES RECORDED LOWEST FIGURE IN YEAR 1, THAN AFTER NUMBER OF FINES INCREASED DRAMATICALLY, REACH IT PEAK OF APPORXIMATELLY 1,600,000 IN 8 YEAR. ON THE OTHER SIDE, NUMBER OF PEOPLE KILLED IN ROAD ACCIDENTS FLUCTUATED MODERATELY BETWEEN ROUGHLY 3000 TO 3400 THROUGHOUT THE PERIOD.

FOR TABLE DATA, 60% OF PEOPLE THINK SPEED CAMERAS ARE NOT ABLE TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS ON THE ROADS, WHILE 32% RECORDED IN THE FAVOR OF SPEED CAMERAS. ADDITIONALLY, AS PER SURVEY 71% INDIVIDUALS THINK RAISE REVENUE THROUGH CAMERA IS THE MAIN AIM NOT IMPROVE ROAD SAFETY.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover the main components: the sharp rise in fines, the relatively stable fatalities, and survey views on whether cameras reduce accidents and why they are installed. Your overview identifies the key contrast, and the figures of about 1.6 million fines and 60% scepticism are consistent with the data. However, the claim that there were “not registered any changes” in accidents is too absolute: fatalities fluctuate between roughly 3,100 and 3,350. You also omit the survey result that 56% consider there to be too many cameras, and the 26% who cite road safety. The response addresses the task, but some information is less fully reported and the overview’s interpretation of public opinion is not entirely precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The report has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on the two trends, and a paragraph on survey findings. This gives the reader a sensible route through the information, and transitions such as “Looking first” and “Additionally” help signal progression. The contrast between fines and fatalities is also easy to identify. To make the organisation more effective, ensure each paragraph develops a complete set of relevant details: the final paragraph covers two survey questions but leaves out the opinions on camera numbers. Some linking phrases, including “On the other side,” sound mechanical or do not express the relationship precisely. Clearer connections between the overview and the supporting figures would make cohesion more flexible and less formulaic.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “fluctuated,” “peak,” “fatalities,” and “reduce the number of accidents,” which helps communicate the main trends. However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable and sometimes make the report harder to read, as in “palced,” “accodcing,” “servey,” and “phenomina.” Several phrases are also unnatural or imprecise: “recorded lowest figure,” “reach it peak,” and “raise revenue through camera.” Aim for accurate collocations and consistent formal wording, such as “the figure was lowest,” “reached a peak,” and “generate revenue from fines.” A broader, more accurately controlled range would help you describe comparisons and survey responses without relying on awkward phrasing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including the contrast in “whilst road accident fatalities fluctuated” and the clause beginning “Looking first at fines.” The main ideas are generally understandable, but errors in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and verb forms recur. For example, “The charts illustrates” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “number of fines increased dramatically, reach it peak” lacks a correctly formed verb sequence. Phrases such as “there are not registered any changes” also have an inaccurate construction. Work on complete, well-formed clauses and check articles and verb endings; for instance, write “the number of fines increased dramatically, reaching its peak.” More accurate control across the sentences is needed.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.