Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given line graphs depicts speed camera fines and the fataities of road accidents over an eight year period, additionally a table illustrating a survey on the opinions on speed cameras of people is also provided.

Overall, the number of people exceeding the limit speed has seen a surge over the years while deaths happening for road accident has stayed above 3000 over the years. The survey on speed camera provides a negative review from people altogether.

The number of people caught on speed camera started with 200,000 in the first year. In the following years it showed a increase upto 800,000 till the 6th year. In the 7th year it soared to 1200,000. In the 8th year, the number became 1600,000 which is double of the number recorded in the 6th year. the 2nd line graph provides a view of deaths happening due to road accidents. it started at just above 3000 which increased in the next to years and again fell to 3000 in 4th year. In the next years the number again went up and ended in 3200 in the 8th year.

The survey demonstrates the opinions of people on having speed camra to reduce road accidents. 60% people think speed cameras do not redure the number of road accidents where 32% replied in the affirmative. 71% people expressed the main reason for speed camera installation is to raise revenue. The third question inquired about the number of speed camera where 56% people think they are too many and 19% find them too few.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both graphs and the survey, and your overview identifies the main contrast: fines rose substantially, while fatalities remained above 3,000. Most reported figures are broadly accurate, including the first and final fine totals and the survey’s 60% negative response and 71% revenue view. However, some details are imprecise: fines in year six were about 780,000, not 800,000, and fatalities ended at about 3,350, not 3,200. The overview’s claim that the survey gives a “negative review” is broad; it would be clearer to identify the strongest findings, such as most respondents believing cameras do not reduce accidents and that there are too many. The final survey question also omits the 17% who said the number was about right. This is relevant coverage, though some features need fuller and more precise reporting.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The report has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, separate discussion of the graphs, and a paragraph on the survey. This makes the information easy to follow, and sequencing phrases such as “In the following years,” “In the 7th year,” and “The third question” help guide the reader. The organisation is coherent, but some links are mechanical or repetitive, particularly the repeated year-by-year openings. The transition from the graph discussion to the survey is clear, though the survey paragraph could group the three findings more systematically. To strengthen progression, compare the broad trends first and then select key figures, using more varied linking and clearer references rather than listing each year in sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for describing trends and survey results, including “surge,” “soared,” “increased,” and “fell,” and the meaning is generally understandable. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “fataities,” “deaths happening for road accident,” “exceeding the limit speed,” and “a negative review from people altogether.” Spelling errors such as “camra” and “redure” also reduce precision. Some expressions are repeated, especially “number” and “people think.” Aim for accurate, natural phrases such as “road fatalities,” “drivers caught speeding,” and “respondents believed.” A wider range of precise reporting verbs and nouns would make the account more fluent, while careful proofreading would prevent spelling slips from distracting the reader.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including the overview clause “while deaths … has stayed above 3000” and the sentence beginning “60% people think … where 32% replied.” The report’s meaning is usually recoverable, but grammatical control is uneven. There are agreement and article errors, for example “line graphs depicts” and “a increase,” as well as awkward sentence construction in “the number became 1600,000 which is double.” Tense and sentence-boundary control also need attention: “the 2nd line graph” begins a sentence with a lowercase letter, and several sentences lack articles or use incomplete patterns. Practise checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete sentence structure, while retaining your attempts at complex comparisons.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.