Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line charts ilustraite the figures of persons killed in road accidents and the fines of driving too fast in the UK during eight years since the introduction of speed cameras. In addition, the tables reflect the answers of surveyed individuals on speed cameras.

Overall, it is evident that the number of fast driving fines have increased drastically throughout the period, while no critical change in the fatalities figure over the same peiod.

Turning to the details, the number of killed people throughout the eight-year period fluctualed slightly between about 3,100 and 3400, inspite of the dramatical increase in the number of fines during the same period. This is in line with the survey results in the first table, where people affirmed that the speed cameras would not reduce the road accidents fatalaities rate.

Furthermore, 71% people belive that the increasing number of speed camera installed will increase the revenues, while only 26% belive that it may improve raod safety. Arround 56% of respondents thinks that the number of speed casmeras is too high, while only 19% belive it is to few

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The report covers the charts and survey, and its overview correctly identifies the sharp rise in fines alongside broadly stable fatalities. It also selects relevant survey findings, including the 71% who thought cameras were installed to raise revenue and the 56% who considered there to be too many. The comparison between fines and fatalities is a useful interpretation, but the claim that respondents affirmed cameras would not reduce fatalities overstates the survey: 60% said they did not reduce accidents, while 32% said they did. Some key details are also imprecise, such as the fatalities range (about 3,100–3,350, rather than 3,400), and the final survey category is omitted. More precise reporting and fuller coverage would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs covering the chart trends and survey results. Linking phrases such as “Overall,” “Turning to the details,” and “Furthermore” help signal progression, and the reader can follow the main comparisons. However, the chart discussion and survey interpretation are joined in a way that makes the relationship between the data and the respondents’ views seem stronger than it is. The final paragraph also ends abruptly after the “too few” figure, without reporting the remaining survey responses or providing a concluding synthesis. To move further, group related information more deliberately and use references that distinguish chart evidence from survey opinions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses some task-relevant vocabulary, including “fatalities,” “survey results,” “respondents,” and “revenues,” and attempts more formal phrasing such as “throughout the period.” However, spelling errors are noticeable, including “ilustraite,” “peiod,” “fatalaities,” “belive,” and “casmeras,” which reduce accuracy and polish. Several word choices or collocations are also awkward: “number of killed people” is less natural than “number of people killed,” and “dramatical increase” should be “dramatic increase.” “Critical change” does not clearly express the intended idea of a substantial change. Build a more reliable range of precise chart language and check spelling and word forms carefully; this would make the report clearer and more natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

There is some variety in sentence structure, including a complex sentence beginning “while no critical change…” and a relative clause in “where people affirmed…”. Most ideas remain understandable, but grammatical control is uneven. For example, “the number of fast driving fines have increased” has subject–verb disagreement; the grammatical subject “number” requires “has.” In “71% people believe,” a determiner such as “of” is needed, and “the number of speed camera installed” needs plural forms and clearer agreement. The sentence beginning “while no critical change…” is also incomplete as written. Aim to produce complete sentences with consistent agreement, articles, and plural forms, while retaining the range of structures attempted.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.