Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given line graphs illustrates the figure of motorists in Britain who were driving with fast pace observed by speed cameras operating on roads along with the count of individuals who found dead in these roadway accidents in the time period of eight years since speed cameras were operated for the first time.

Overall , it can be seen that , the fines for speed cameras increased , while the figure of deaths in road accidents fluctuated over the given period of time in Britain.

To begin with , in the prior year speed cameras witnessed fine of 200,000 which inclined gradually by double in next year. In the third year , fines observed minor change in comparison with 2nd year. 800,000 fine was recorded after three years. In the last year speed cameras fine was at peak with the count of 1,600,000.

On the other hand, 3200 individuals found dead in road accident in the 1st year of speed cameras. The number of roadway accident fatalities dropped slightly in the forth year with the count of 3000. In the year 5th, 6th, and 7th the figure of people killed during accidents were 3100, 3050, 3300 respectively. 3350 travellers were recorded fatal in the last year.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

The report identifies the broad contrast that fines rose while fatalities fluctuated, but it does not cover the task as a whole: all three survey tables are omitted, so a major part of the visual information is unreported. Several graph figures are also inaccurate or unclear. For example, fines in year 2 were about 300,000, not double the year-1 figure, and the year-6 value was about 780,000 rather than 800,000 after three years. Fatalities were about 3,150 in year 1 and 3,300 in year 2, not 3,200 initially; the year-7 figure was around 3,200, not 3,300. To improve, summarise the survey’s main findings and select accurate comparisons from both graphs, including the overall stability of fatalities despite the sharp rise in fines.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two graphs. Phrases such as “Overall” and “On the other hand” help signal the shift between trends. However, progression within the detail paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow. The fines paragraph jumps from year 3 to “800,000” without clearly identifying the year, then moves to the final year; the phrase “after three years” is also ambiguous. The survey information is absent, leaving the report’s coverage and organisation incomplete. Use a clearer chronological sequence, identify each year or period precisely, and group the survey results in a final paragraph. Avoid unnecessary spaces before commas, which interrupt the flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

There is some range in the vocabulary, including “fluctuated,” “gradually,” “peak,” and “fatalities,” and the reader can generally understand the intended trends. However, several choices are unnatural or imprecise for describing the charts: “driving with fast pace observed by speed cameras,” “witnessed fine,” and “recorded fatal” do not express the data idiomatically. “Individuals who found dead” is also an awkward way to describe people killed in accidents. These noticeable collocation and word-form problems limit precision, even though the main topic remains recognisable. Prefer standard chart-reporting language such as “were caught speeding,” “the number of fines,” and “people were killed.” Check that each verb accurately describes a figure or trend.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts a mixture of simple statements and longer structures, including the overview clause beginning “while” and the opening sentence with “who.” However, control is uneven, and errors occur in basic sentence patterns as well as longer ones. For example, “The given line graphs illustrates” has subject–verb disagreement, while “individuals who found dead” is missing the passive auxiliary “were.” The sentence beginning “In the prior year” also lacks a clear grammatical connection between the cameras and the fine figure. Articles, tense choices, and punctuation are not consistently controlled; spaces before commas recur throughout. Build accuracy with direct patterns such as “The number of fines rose from … to …” and “About … people were killed,” then proofread agreement, auxiliaries, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.