Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line graphs illustrate the proportion of drivers in Britain who have been found driving fast than speed limits by speed cameras and tthe other one shows how many people died in road accidents.While,The table shows opinion of people on speed cameras.

Overall,This is easily show that number of Fines are increased over the period,where number of an Accidents are fluctuated.From survey it is found that people are not happy with speed cameras.

First year after installtion of speed cameras there were 200,000 money was collected,this number was increased and reached at 300,000 after 3 years.For 4th year this number was neligibly increased to 500,000.In sixth year number was surged to near 800,000,this trend was continue and in year 7 the number rose by 400,000 than privious year and last year the number accounted for 1,600,000.The number of Road accident is fluctuated between 3,000 to 3,300 over the period.

From survey,60% people were not thought that speed cameras reduced the roads accident.71% people believe that speed camreas install because to raise revenue while only 26% believe it was install for road safety.56% people thought that there were too many cameras,while 19% says it was too few and 17% say that it was complete amount in number.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both graphs and the survey, and your overview identifies the main contrast: fines rose substantially while fatalities fluctuated. The figures for fines, including 200,000 initially, about 800,000 in year six and 1,600,000 in year eight, are broadly accurate. You also report the survey’s main findings, especially that 60% rejected the cameras’ effect on accidents and 71% thought revenue was the main reason for installation. However, the fatalities are described only as ranging from 3,000 to 3,300, whereas the chart reaches about 3,350, and the overview could state more clearly that fatalities showed no sustained trend. Some survey details are less fully explained, and “people are not happy” is a broad interpretation rather than a precise summary of the mixed responses.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable report structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on the graphs and a final paragraph on survey results. This helps the reader follow the main categories of information. However, progression within the graph paragraph is sometimes awkward, and several linking expressions are either mechanical or unclear, such as “this trend was continue” and “while” at the start of the introduction. The long sequence of yearly figures would be easier to follow if grouped into stages and connected with clearer comparisons. Punctuation also disrupts cohesion: missing spaces after full stops and inconsistent capitalisation make sentence boundaries difficult to identify. Use a small range of accurate links, and keep each sentence focused on one comparison or trend.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “fluctuated,” “revenue,” “road safety” and “accounted for,” and the reader can generally understand the intended comparisons. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive. For example, “the number of Fines are increased” and “the number of Road accident is fluctuated” do not express the trends naturally; “money was collected” also mislabels the chart, which records fines rather than money collected. There are noticeable spelling errors, including “installtion,” “neligibly,” “privious” and “camreas.” Some phrases, such as “complete amount in number,” are difficult to interpret. Build a more reliable set of trend expressions and check spelling and word forms before finishing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences with clauses, for example the sentence describing the rise in fines through years seven and eight. However, control of sentence structure is inconsistent, and errors in agreement, tense, articles and clause formation recur. Examples include “number of Fines are increased,” “people were not thought,” and “it was install”; these should use appropriate subject–verb agreement and passive or reporting structures. The opening also joins sentences without clear punctuation, while “First year after installtion of speed cameras there were 200,000 money was collected” contains an incomplete and confusing construction. Aim first for accurate, complete sentences, then add complex clauses selectively. Consistent past-tense reporting and careful sentence boundaries would make the data easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.