Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The graphs illustrate the number of motorists in Britain who were caught speeding by road cameras and the number of fatalities resulting from road accidents over the eight years following the introduction of speed cameras. The tables present the findings of a survey on public attitudes towards these cameras.

Overall, the number of drivers caught speeding by road cameras increased considerably over the eight-year period, while the number of road fatalities fluctuated slightly. Additionally, the survey revealed varying public opinions on the use of speed cameras.

In the first year following the introduction of road cameras, approximately 200,000 drivers were caught speeding. The figure then increased gradually, reaching 800,000 in the fifth year after the cameras were installed. Thereafter, the number rose sharply, reaching 1.6 million by the end of the period.

From the survey, it is clear that the majority of people accounting for 60% do not believe that the speed cameras reduces the number of accidents on the road. Out of 100%, 71% think raising revenue might be the main reson for the intsallation of speed cameras. However, 3% people are unknown about the reason. Regarding public opinion, the largest proportion of respondents believed that there were too many speed cameras, accounting for 56%. In contrast, the smallest proportion of people thought that [insert the least popular opinion], representing only 8% of those surveyed.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You introduce both charts and the survey, and your overview correctly identifies the sharp rise in speeding detections alongside broadly stable fatalities. However, the report does not describe the fatalities series with any figures or specific fluctuations, leaving a major visual feature unreported. The fines data also contains a notable inaccuracy: you say the figure reached 800,000 in year five, whereas the chart shows about 580,000; it reaches roughly 780,000 in year six. The survey is covered more fully, but the final comparison is left as “[insert the least popular opinion]” rather than identifying the 8% who did not know how many cameras there should be. These omissions and inaccuracies make coverage uneven; include the missing trend and complete the comparison.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on the fines trend, and a paragraph on survey findings. Sequencing is generally easy to follow, and transitions such as “Thereafter” and “In contrast” help signal relationships. However, the fatalities chart is not given its own discussion, so the report’s progression across the visual information feels incomplete. In the survey paragraph, “From the survey” and “Regarding public opinion” introduce related points, but the sequence could be more systematic by grouping each question’s results and comparing the largest and smallest shares. The unfinished bracketed phrase also interrupts the flow and weakens the paragraph’s ending. A complete final comparison and more balanced paragraphing would improve cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-appropriate vocabulary, including “fluctuated slightly,” “increased considerably,” “rose sharply,” and “largest proportion.” These choices communicate the main trends clearly. Some wording is less precise or natural: “the majority of people accounting for 60%” is awkward, and “people are unknown about the reason” does not accurately express that respondents did not know. “The number of drivers caught speeding” is also more precise than switching to “the number of motorists” if you want consistent terminology. There are spelling errors in “reson” and “intsallation,” and the placeholder “[insert the least popular opinion]” is not suitable in a finished report. Aim for accurate survey language such as “respondents” and “were unsure,” and proofread spelling.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, and several sentences are controlled well, such as “The figure then increased gradually, reaching 800,000 in the fifth year.” The opening sentence also handles the two chart subjects in a clear structure. Some grammatical errors remain. In “the speed cameras reduces,” the plural subject requires “reduce.” The phrase “3% people” needs a determiner or a different construction, for example “3% of respondents.” In “the majority of people accounting for 60% do not believe,” the participial phrase is awkwardly attached; write “60% of respondents do not believe…” The bracketed placeholder also leaves the final sentence structurally incomplete. More careful agreement and sentence completion would make the report more consistently accurate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.