Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The line graph illustrates the amount of drivers who have been captured for rash driving by speed cameras installed on roads in britain also the count of population killed in road accidents throughout eight years ,while the table describes the outcome of survey based on population's perception about speed cameras.

Overall,the count of people captured by speed cameras for rash driving increased gradually across eight years and the amount of people killed fluctuates throughtout the period.According to the survey large population thought that speed cameras didnot reduce no of accidents ann only reason for them was to raise revenue.

the most dramatic increase in captured rash drivers was seen from 6 to 8 year where the fine grew from 8lakh to 16lakh that doub

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response4.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify the two main trends: fines rise over the period, while fatalities fluctuate, and you report the survey’s broad view that most respondents doubted cameras reduced accidents and believed revenue was the main motive. However, the report is incomplete and only partially covers the visual information. It ends mid-sentence at “that doub…”, gives no account of the other survey result about camera numbers, and provides very little detail on fatalities or the earlier years. The figures “8 lakh” and “16 lakh” broadly match the fines in years 6 and 8, but the claim that the increase was gradual overlooks the sharper rise in the final years. The response is also 26 words below the required minimum. Add a complete summary and select key comparisons from both charts and all survey questions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is a basic structure: an introduction, an overview, and the beginning of a detail paragraph. The overview signals the main contrast between rising fines and fluctuating fatalities, which gives the reader a starting point. However, the response stops abruptly in the final paragraph, so the information has no complete progression or conclusion. Connections between ideas are limited, and the long opening sentence combines the graph and table descriptions without clear separation. The transition “Overall” is useful, but the following sentence contains several ideas joined together, making the survey summary difficult to follow. Use separate paragraphs for the overview, graph details, and survey findings, and complete each point before moving on.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “line graph,” “fluctuates,” “survey,” and “revenue,” so the topic is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for a formal report. “Captured for rash driving” is not a precise description of people caught speeding, while “amount of drivers” and “count of population” are awkward collocations. “Fine grew” also confuses the number of fines with the value of a fine. Spelling and informal forms such as “britain,” “didnot,” “no of,” and “8lakh” reduce accuracy and formality. Choose precise terms such as “drivers caught speeding,” “number of fatalities,” and “number of fines issued,” and check spelling and spacing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts some longer sentence forms, particularly in the opening and overview, and the main message can usually be understood. However, control is inconsistent, and errors in sentence boundaries, agreement, articles, and punctuation are frequent enough to make parts difficult to read. For example, “The line graph illustrates … also the count” joins two clauses without a suitable connector or punctuation, and “large population thought” is missing an article or quantifier. The opening also lacks consistent capitalization and spacing after punctuation. The final sentence is incomplete, ending with “that doub…”. Build shorter, complete sentences first, then add subordinate clauses carefully; check articles, verb agreement, commas, and full stops during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.