Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-15
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES
Student answer (Band 4.5)
Speeding have been a promblem in big cities since the vehicles evolved to become a daily part of life. To tackle these problems with the speeding cars the government introduce speed cameras. These camera were used to caught people who were breaking the speed limit and of course it came with a fine. People caught speeding were fined by the police, so they might learn their lesson and never speed again. But the question does introducing these camera reduce the number of accident on roads or not. Well, according to the 8 years survey the number of accident didn't go down as much because the accident is not affected by the speed of the vehicle. There are many other factors that affect the accident. And people opinion is the same, 71% of poeple think that these cameras are just the scheme of government to increase their revnue. But people should realize that speeding is not related to accident.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 3.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5
The response recognises the topic of speed cameras and refers to one survey result, stating that 71% believe the cameras are intended to raise revenue. However, it does not adequately report the visual information: the eight-year figures for fines and fatalities are omitted, as are the other survey findings (including the 60% who say cameras do not reduce accidents and the 56% who think there are too many). The claim that accidents are unaffected by vehicle speed is an unsupported opinion, not a conclusion established by the charts. The task asks for a factual report, so describe the main trends and comparisons rather than arguing a personal case. Include a concise overview and select key figures from both graphs and all three survey questions.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
There is a basic progression from the general topic of speeding to cameras, then to public opinion, and the response uses a few linking expressions such as “But” and “And.” However, it reads mainly as one continuous argument rather than a clearly organised report. The opening background takes up space without guiding the reader through the data, and the graphs are not discussed in a logical sequence. Some links are also unclear: “the number of accident didn't go down as much” does not specify which figures or period are being compared. Organise the response into an introduction, an overview, and focused paragraphs for the graphs and survey. Use references such as “the fines figure” and “the survey results” to make connections precise.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The response has enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate its general subject, including “speed cameras,” “speed limit,” “fine,” and “revenue.” It also attempts phrases such as “tackle these problems” and “learn their lesson.” However, the range is limited and several choices or spellings reduce accuracy, including “promblem,” “poeple,” and “revnue.” Some expressions are imprecise for an academic report: “scheme of government” is not a natural way to describe the survey finding, and “accident” is repeated without variation. Build a more precise reporting vocabulary, for example “the proportion,” “rose,” “remained broadly stable,” and “respondents believed.” Check spelling and collocations, and avoid informal or argumentative wording.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response attempts both simple and longer sentences, including a question and clauses introduced by “because” and “so.” Meaning is generally recoverable, but frequent errors in basic forms and sentence construction limit control. Examples include “Speeding have been,” “the government introduce,” “These camera were used to caught,” and “the number of accident didn't go down.” These show problems with subject–verb agreement, tense, plural forms, and verb patterns. The question “does introducing these camera reduce…” is also not formed accurately. Practise accurate past-tense reporting and agreement, and check singular and plural nouns. For instance, use “speeding has been,” “the government introduced,” and “cameras were used to catch.” Aim for clear, controlled sentences before adding more complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
