Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The line charts given illustrate the number of drivers that are caught overspeeding by speed cameras on road and the number of road accident fatalities over the 8 year period since the speed cameras were introduced in Britain.

The chart on the left shows the fines that are imposed on drivers for overspeeding. Overall, the chart shows increasing trend. Starting from 200 thousand in first year to all the way up to 1600 thousand in the eigth year. From 1st to 5th year, the fine increases gradually to 600 thousand only. But in the last three years, it rises sharply from 800 thousand in 6th year and 1200 thousand in 7th year.

The chart on the right reports the number of people involved in accident due to overspeeding. The chart shows fluctuating trend between 3000 to 3500. In the first year, there are 3100 road casualities, it increases and then shows a minumum value of 3000 in the 4th year. It again increases in 5th year to 3200 and again drops to 3000 in 6th year. Afterwards, it increases to 3400 people by the 8th year.

In conclusion, while due to speed cameras, fines are imposed and even showed increasing trend but it has negligible effect on road accidents that shows numbers between 3000 to 3500 throughout these eight years.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The report identifies the broad contrast between sharply rising fines and fatalities that remain within a narrow range, and it gives several relevant figures. However, it only minimally addresses the task because it omits all three survey tables, a substantial part of the visual information. Some chart details are also inaccurate: fines reach about 580,000 in year five, not 600,000; fatalities are about 3,300 in years two and three, with a low of roughly 3,100 in year four, not 3,000. The final claim that cameras had a negligible effect is stronger than the data alone can establish. To improve, summarise the survey findings and report the main trends and comparisons more accurately and cautiously.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two charts, and a concluding comparison. This makes the main subject easy to follow, and phrases such as “Overall” and “In conclusion” signal the stages of the report. However, the progression is limited because the survey information is not incorporated, and the chart descriptions sometimes read as a sequence of figures rather than a clear selection of key comparisons. Some linking is mechanical, particularly the repeated “again” in the fatalities paragraph. Organise the report around the main overview, then group the most important details, including the survey results, and use clearer comparisons between the charts and survey responses.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the main trends, with useful terms such as “increasing trend,” “fluctuating,” “rises sharply,” and “imposed.” However, the range is limited and some choices are inaccurate or awkward for a formal data report. “Drivers that are caught overspeeding” is less natural than “drivers caught speeding,” while “people involved in accident” does not accurately describe fatalities. There are also spelling errors, including “eigth,” “casualities,” and “minumum,” which reduce precision. Aim for more exact chart language and check spelling carefully; for example, distinguish between fines, speeding offences, and people killed rather than using these ideas interchangeably.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response uses both simple sentences and some longer structures, and the meaning is generally understandable. However, grammatical control is uneven, with recurring errors in articles, agreement, and sentence construction. Examples include “on road” instead of “on the road,” “shows increasing trend” instead of “shows an increasing trend,” and “the fine increases” where the subject is the number of fines. The fragment “Starting from 200 thousand in first year to all the way up to 1600 thousand” is not a complete sentence, and “it increases and then shows a minimum value” has an unclear reference. Use complete sentences, check articles and subject–verb agreement, and make pronouns clearly refer to the figures being described.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.