Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.0)

There are two grapths given,These graphs shows speed camera fines and road accident fatalities.At the first,We will discuss these both.Let's talk about speed camera fine.There are 1-8 years shown in graph.The amount of fine rises up as the year changes.Starting from year 1,The fine is 200,000.In year 2,The amount of penalty is 300,000.In year of 3,The fine increased to 400,000.As the year changes the fine is going higher and higher.In year 4,the penalty increased to 500,000.In year 5,the fine is almost 550,000.The year 6 shows that the penalty increased to 800,000.Now in year 7,the penalty increased much higher,It is about 1,200,000.And in year 8,it increased more of about 1,600,000.

Now, we will discuss the road accident fatalities.We can see that road accident fatalities is about 3000 among all years.In year 1,the death from road accidents is about 31,000.In year 2,the amount of disaster from road accidents increased to 34,000.At the year of 3,the amount of deaths from accidents is 34,000 as deaths in year 2.In year 4, the amount of disasters from road accidents is 30,000.In year 5,the amount of people who died with road accidents is 32,000.In year 6, the road accidents fatalities in 31,000.In year 7, the deaths are about 33,000.And in year 8, the amount of people who died in road accidents is 34,000.

Now we will discuss, the university leactuer questioning the students about road accidents.At the first,he discusses do you think speed cameras reduce the number of accidents on the road?The students who said yes are 32%,Some of them said no,There percentage is 60% and somw said don't know and the percentage is 8%.The seconds question he ask is what do you think is the main reason for the installation of speed camera.26% students said to improve road safety,71% said to raise revenue and 3% said don't know.The last question he asked is what do you think abot the number of speed cameras on the road? 56% replied too many,19% answered too few,17% said about right and 8% said don't know.From the table we can see that almost everybody replied only few of them didn't answered.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You cover the two graphs and all three survey questions, and several figures are close to the chart, such as the rise in fines from 200,000 to 1,600,000 and the survey result that 60% answered “No.” However, the report does not give a reliable account of the data: fatalities are repeatedly reported as 30,000–34,000, whereas the chart shows roughly 3,100–3,350. Some fine figures are also inaccurate, including year 3 (about 380,000, not 400,000) and year 5 (about 580,000, not 550,000). There is no clear overview of the main patterns, and the final claim that “almost everybody” replied is unsupported. Select the key trends, summarise them accurately, and avoid adding a setting such as a lecturer questioning students.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response follows a recognisable order: it describes fines, then fatalities, and finally the survey. This helps the reader locate the different information, and phrases such as “In year 4” provide basic sequencing. However, progression is often mechanical, with repeated openings such as “Now we will discuss” and “In year…,” and the report lacks a concise overview to connect the main findings. The long blocks also make the sections difficult to distinguish. Use separate paragraphs for the overview, graphs, and survey, and group related years rather than listing every point in sequence. More varied, accurate linking would make comparisons clearer and reduce repetition.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary, including “increased,” “fatalities,” “installation,” and “road safety,” so the topic is generally identifiable. However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for a formal data report. “The amount of disaster from road accidents” does not clearly mean the number of deaths, while “penalty” is used repeatedly where “fines” is more precise. “The fine is going higher and higher” is conversational and repetitive, and “the university lecturer questioning the students” invents a context not shown in the tables. Aim for precise reporting language and avoid synonyms that change or obscure the meaning of the data.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts both short statements and longer sentences, and the reader can follow much of the intended sequence. However, grammatical errors are frequent and sometimes affect clarity. Examples include “These graphs shows,” where the plural subject requires “show,” and “road accident fatalities is,” where the subject requires a plural verb. There are also faulty sentence patterns, such as “In year of 3” and “the road accidents fatalities in 31,000,” as well as inconsistent capitalisation after commas and full stops. Build accuracy with straightforward sentence patterns first, checking subject–verb agreement, articles, and complete clauses. Then add comparisons using controlled structures such as “while” and “whereas.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.