Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line graphs describe about the number of drivers in Britian who have been fined by speed cameras and number of fatalities in road accidents over an eight year peiod. The table shows about the opinion of people through survey on speed cameras.

Overall, there's an huge increase in the speed camera fines, the heighest challans were in the year 8. The fatalities in road accidents fluctuated but the number increased in the last year. Most of the people belives that accidents are not reduced by installing of speed cameras, and the main purpose behind that is revenue. A lot of people also think that the number of speed cameras are high.

The speed camera fines accounted for 200,000 in 1st year raised gradually till year 6, where number counted for 800,000. In next year there is a sudden increase and the numbers become doubled in year 8. The fatalities in road accidents reported for just over 3000 in 1st year. The number rose to around 3400 for next two years and in the next year there's a drop and reaches to around 3000. The numbers fluctuated in the next two years until it increased again and reaches just below 35 in the last year.

In the survey about speed cameras the 60% people believe that speed cameras didn't reduce the accidents, 32% votes in favour of them and 8% didn't show their opinion. The 71% of people believed that installation of speed cameras was done to increase revenue. 26% belived that it improved road safety and 3% didnt say anything about that. For the number of speed cameras, 56% believed that they are in excessive, 19% accounted it for too less. 17% considered them in right numbers and 8% didn't show any interest.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both graphs and all three survey questions, and your overview identifies the main patterns: fines rose substantially, fatalities fluctuated, and respondents were generally sceptical about cameras. Most survey percentages are reported accurately. However, some graph details are misread: fatalities in years 2 and 3 are about 3,300, not 3,400, and the final figure is around 3,350, not “just below 35.” The fines also rise sharply in years 7 and 8, rather than simply doubling in year 8. The overview is relevant, but the description of the fatality trend and the key changes in fines could be more precise. Select the most important comparisons and check each figure against the chart.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, a paragraph on the graphs, and a final paragraph covering the survey. This makes the information easy to locate, and phrases such as “Overall” and “In the survey” help signal shifts in focus. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear, particularly the repeated use of “The number” and “In the next year.” The graph paragraph would be easier to follow if the two series were described in separate, clearly sequenced sentences, with years and changes linked more precisely. In the survey paragraph, grouping the results by question is effective, but transitions between the three questions could be more consistent. Overall progression is sound, though cohesion and referencing are not always smooth.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “fluctuated,” “revenue,” “road safety,” and “installation,” and the reader can generally understand the intended comparisons. However, noticeable spelling, word-form, and collocation problems limit precision: “Britian,” “peiod,” “heighest,” and “belives” are misspelled, while “excessive” and “too less” are awkward in this context. “Challans” is also not an appropriate term for a formal IELTS report about fines. Several phrases, such as “show about the opinion” and “didn't show any interest,” are imprecise. Build a more reliable range of chart-description vocabulary and check spelling and natural word combinations before finishing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. Some sentence forms are controlled, such as “The fatalities in road accidents fluctuated but the number increased in the last year.” However, errors in articles, agreement, and verb forms recur: “there's an huge increase,” “Most of the people belives,” and “the numbers … reaches.” There are also awkward constructions such as “The speed camera fines accounted for 200,000” and “19% accounted it for too less,” which make relationships between figures and opinions unclear. Use a consistent past tense for the eight-year data, check singular/plural agreement, and practise forming comparisons with accurate subjects and verbs. Greater accuracy across these structures would make the report more fluent.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.