Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The graphs below demonstrate the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables represent the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

We can notice that the number of fines for speed cameras increases gradually over time. It rose from 200,000 to 1,600,000 over 8 years.

As for the road fatalities, we can see that the changes were minor due to using speed cameras. We can see that the curve is almost straight which means that implementing speed cameras did not have any effect on the road fatalities. In year 1 it was 3100, and in year 8 it was 3400.

Even though the reason for installing speed cameras were to reduce road accidents, however that had little to no effect on the number of accidents on road.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

The response identifies the main rise in fines, from 200,000 to 1,600,000, and recognises that fatalities changed relatively little. However, it omits the survey results entirely, so a substantial part of the task is not covered. The claim that cameras had “little to no effect” is a reasonable interpretation of the broadly stable fatality figures, but the report does not describe the fluctuations or compare the survey’s views with the chart data. It also gives only a brief account of the figures and has no clear, complete overview of all the visuals. The response is 111 words, below the required 150; the 52 words copied from the prompt are not counted. Include the key survey findings and develop the main comparisons to address the task more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The information follows a basic, understandable order: the introduction identifies the visuals, followed by comments on fines and fatalities. Phrases such as “As for” help signal a shift between topics. However, the response ends without discussing the survey tables, leaving the report incomplete and its progression abrupt. The final sentence repeats the idea that cameras did not reduce accidents rather than adding a new comparison. Some linking is also awkward: “Even though … however” uses two contrasting signals together. Organise the report into a clear overview and focused paragraphs covering the charts and survey, and use transitions to show how the findings relate rather than repeating them.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for communicating the basic trends, with relevant terms such as “fines,” “road fatalities,” “gradually,” and “implementing speed cameras.” The wording is generally understandable, but the range is narrow and several expressions are imprecise or repetitive. “The number of fines for speed cameras” is less natural than a phrase describing drivers caught or fines issued, while “the curve is almost straight” is an informal way to describe stable figures. Repeated use of “We can see” also limits variety. More precise reporting language would help distinguish a steady increase from relatively small fluctuations and make the account sound more academic. The missing survey discussion also limits opportunities to demonstrate vocabulary for proportions and opinions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response uses mostly clear simple sentences and attempts some more complex structures, including “which means that implementing speed cameras did not have any effect.” Meaning is generally accessible, but the range of sentence patterns is limited, and some errors remain. In “the reason for installing speed cameras were,” the singular subject “reason” requires “was.” The construction “Even though … however” is also faulty because the two contrast markers should not be used together; use one or the other. The opening sentence is long and closely reproduces the task wording, while the rest relies mainly on short statements. Practise combining accurate comparisons with varied clauses, and check subject–verb agreement and sentence connectors during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.