Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The graphs below show the number of drivers in Britain who have been caught driving too fast by speed cameras placed on roads, and the number of people killed in road accidents, over an eight-year period since the introduction of speed cameras. The tables show the results of a survey on people's opinions on speed cameras.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

SPEED CAMERA FINES and ROAD ACCIDENT FATALITIES

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given graphs illustrates the number of drivers in Britain who got caught driving with higher speed by the speed cameras which were fitted on the road. It also depicts the number of accidents occured and death numbers of people after the speed camera got introduced. Along with the graphs, there are three tables given which are showing the percentages came out from a survey of peoples take on speed cameras. Overall, we can get the idea of the numerical analysis of the speed cameras, accidents and the opinions of people.

In the graphs we can see that the fines of speed cameras kepts increasing while the number of accident stayed quite steady with no significant increase but inceased to the highest possible number of people.

In the tables we can see the negative opinions are greater in all three tables with higher percentage of 60%, 71% and 57% and positive feedbacks have the same constant pattern of being on the second position with 32%, 26% and 17%. The percentage of Don't know is almost the same at the lowest percentage of 8%,3%and 8%.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the main components—the rising fines, broadly stable fatalities, and survey opinions—and include several percentages. However, the report only partially describes the visual data: it gives no figures or stages for either graph, and the overview is unclear. In particular, fatalities do not show a clear upward trend to a highest possible number; they fluctuate around 3,100–3,350, ending slightly above the starting point. The survey figures are also misreported: 56%, not 57%, said there were too many cameras, and the three percentages you call “negative opinions” refer to different response categories. To improve, give a clear overview and select key comparisons, such as fines rising from about 200,000 to 1.6 million while fatalities remain fairly steady.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an opening paragraph introduces the visuals, followed by a paragraph about the graphs and one about the survey. This makes the broad organisation easy to follow. However, progression within the report is limited because the graph paragraph gives no specific stages or figures, and the survey paragraph groups unlike answers together as “negative opinions.” Some linking and reference are also mechanical, particularly the repeated openings “In the graphs we can see” and “In the tables we can see.” Use a concise overview, then organise details into clear comparisons—for example, one section for the two trends and another for the survey results—so each paragraph develops a distinct point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “fines,” “percentage,” “survey,” and “steady,” so the topic is generally clear. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning awkward: “driving with higher speed,” “death numbers of people,” and “positive feedbacks” are not natural descriptions in this context. There are also noticeable spelling and word-form errors, such as “occured,” “kepts,” and “inceased.” Aim for precise chart language and check spelling carefully. For example, describe drivers as “caught speeding,” fatalities as “the number of people killed,” and survey answers as “responses” rather than “feedbacks.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including the opening sentence with a relative clause and the sentence beginning “Along with the graphs.” However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction are frequent enough to make some statements difficult to interpret. For example, “The given graphs illustrates” has a plural subject with a singular verb, while “the number of accident stayed” has an incorrect plural form and verb agreement. The phrase “the percentage of Don't know is” also needs a clearer grammatical construction. Practise checking each sentence for subject–verb agreement and consistent tense, and use shorter, controlled sentences when describing trends before attempting more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.