Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.

Do you agree or disagree?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In today's rapidly changing world there are various masses who believe that it is really easy to be famious in fields like music, literature, acting and art ect. which leads to depreciate the genuine talent and art from the market. I fully agree with this statement technology have been made easly to achieve success in these fields, further discussion would be made in following passage.

First and foremost, Technology have been made a huge advancement the field of art, with the help of internet anyone can create music or write a whole book with in few minutes which they can publish or upload on any site to get come side income. Moreover, it empower non-skilled people to work and achive success and also help to create an false image in the socity which may have a crucial impact on the environment. To illustrate, a person having no knowledge regarding singing but still me produce music with the help of AI and upload it in youtube and that song become famous, but when people called him for live performance at that time he is not being able to perform that song which it effect the sentimants of the socity.

On the other hand, there are people who are blessed with this kind of talent or art but because of such people their talent got demineshed and they remained unpopular due which they have to do another job so that they could achieve batter lifestyle. Further, their talent remained unvalued or appreciated which make them face a backclash, For instance, an artist blessed with natural skill of painting and use to sell his painting in the market but people start to use technology to generate painting insted of buying it from him.

To conclude, technology have given unauthorised power to the citizens and people are using to become more famous and rich instead of appreciating genuine talent or people who are born with such talent or who have been work hard to polish such skill.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction (“I fully agree”), and the response addresses both the rise of people gaining fame without artistic ability and the reduced recognition of genuine talent. The examples of AI-generated music and computer-generated paintings are relevant and help explain your view. This meets the core requirements well. To make the argument more fully developed, explain more precisely how online popularity translates into wealth or fame, and distinguish between technology making art accessible and audiences choosing to value less-skilled work. The claim that a song’s creator cannot perform it live is useful, but its effect on society is asserted rather than demonstrated. More specific explanation and support would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting related points, and a conclusion that restates your position. Sequencing phrases such as “First and foremost,” “On the other hand,” and “To conclude” help signal the stages of the argument. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “further discussion would be made in following passage” announces the essay rather than advancing it, while “which it effect the sentiments of the society” makes the relationship between the live performance and the audience difficult to follow. The second body paragraph also shifts from the artist’s reduced popularity to the need to take another job without fully linking those ideas. Use clearer references and explain the links between claims.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “genuine talent,” “natural skill,” “live performance,” and “generate painting,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “crucial impact.” This gives you enough range to discuss the issue, but inaccurate word choice, spelling, and collocation are noticeable and sometimes make meaning less clear. Examples include “depreciate” where you mean that talent is undervalued, “demineshed,” “backclash,” and “achieve batter lifestyle.” Some phrases, such as “various masses” and “false image in the society,” are also unnatural or imprecise. Aim for accurate, natural combinations and check spelling carefully; this will make your ideas easier to understand and more convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “which,” “but,” and “so that,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, control is inconsistent, particularly in longer sentences. Subject–verb agreement errors appear in “Technology have been made” and “that song become famous”; verb forms are also faulty in “it empower” and “people are using to become.” Articles and sentence construction need attention, as in “create an false image” and “a person … but still me produce music.” Several sentences join multiple ideas without clear grammatical boundaries, making them difficult to follow. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns first, then add subordinate clauses, and check each sentence for a complete, correctly formed main clause.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.