Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-08-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.

Do you agree or disagree?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 7.5)

In the past, talented people were highly appreciated. However, nowadays, the situation has reversed. In many societies, untalented individuals repeatedly produce subpar work, arguing that "anyone can do it," thereby degrading culture. I fully agree that the value of geniuses has dramatically decreased. In the following paragraphs, I will substantiate my viewpoints.

In a century where attention is the most valuable currency, everyone seeks to capture it in different ways. Some go to extremes—just turn on your phone and open any news or social media platform, and you will see "incomplete" creators, artists, and musicians. As society evolves, culture does as well, forming new branches and becoming increasingly personal and taste-dependent. For example, in the past, music had only a few main genres like jazz, rock, classical, and national styles. But today, each of these genres has divided into countless subgenres, making it difficult to define a single standard of quality.

In the past, the mindset of "anyone can do it" didn't exist, and cultural behavior followed logical principles. Artists like Leonardo da Vinci, actors like Leonardo DiCaprio, and musicians like Bob Dylan were masters of their craft, staying within their areas of expertise. However, today, some artists merely splash paint onto a canvas, poets ignore traditional poetry rules, screenwriters create illogical plots, and musicians produce whatever they please, dismissing criticism by saying, "It's not my fault if the listener doesn't like my music." Culture, which has been built brick by brick over millennia with the contributions of countless individuals, is now being dismantled piece by piece by so-called "new-wave" thinkers. This poses a serious threat to future generations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, clearly stating a position in the introduction and maintaining it throughout. The ideas are relevant and well-developed, particularly the contrast between historical artistic standards and modern trends. The argument is logical, though it could be further strengthened by providing a more specific contemporary example of 'untalented' success to balance the historical examples of da Vinci or DiCaprio. The conclusion effectively summarizes the threat to future generations, demonstrating a clear focus on the task requirements.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between the historical context and the modern critique is smooth. Cohesive devices such as 'However,' 'For example,' and 'In a century where' are used effectively to link sentences and ideas. The paragraphing is appropriate, and the flow of the argument is easy to follow. There is no evidence of mechanical or repetitive use of linking words, indicating a high level of control over the structure of the essay.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.0

The vocabulary is varied and appropriate for an academic context. Phrases like 'valuable currency,' 'subpar work,' and 'dismantled piece by piece' demonstrate a good range and a sophisticated command of language. The student uses less common items effectively, such as 'substantiate' and 'expertise.' While the language is precise, it occasionally leans toward a slightly informal tone in phrases like 'just turn on your phone,' but this does not impede communication or detract significantly from the overall quality of the writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5

The essay demonstrates a good range of complex structures, including conditional-like structures and varied sentence lengths. The grammar is generally accurate, with the majority of sentences being error-free. Punctuation is used correctly to manage complex ideas. There are no significant grammatical errors that cause confusion. The control over tense and subject-verb agreement is consistent throughout the piece, reflecting a high level of grammatical competence suitable for a high band score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.