Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-08-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.

Do you agree or disagree?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 7.5)

In many countries, the arts have become increasingly accessible, allowing almost anyone to pursue careers in music, literature, acting and visual art. Some people argue that this has resulted in individuals with little genuine talent becoming wealthy and famous, while talented artists receive less recognition. I partly agree with this view, although I believe that popularity and artistic ability are not always mutually exclusive.

On the one hand, modern technology and social media have made it much easier for people without professional training to gain public attention. Platforms such as YouTube, TikTok and Instagram allow individuals to share their work directly with millions of viewers without needing approval from traditional publishers, record companies or galleries. Consequently, people may become famous because of their appearance, personality or controversial behaviour rather than their artistic ability. For example, an inexperienced singer can become widely known after a short video goes viral, even though technically stronger musicians may have spent years developing their skills without receiving similar attention. In this sense, commercial success does not necessarily indicate genuine talent.

On the other hand, I do not believe that the rise of amateur artists has caused genuine talent to lose its value completely. The internet can actually provide talented individuals with opportunities that were previously unavailable. A gifted musician, writer or artist can now build an international audience independently and attract employers, publishers or producers. Furthermore, the public does not judge artistic quality solely by technical skill. Creativity, originality and the ability to connect emotionally with an audience are also important forms of talent. Therefore, someone who becomes famous without conventional training should not automatically be considered untalented.

In conclusion, I agree that social media and modern entertainment can sometimes reward popularity rather than genuine artistic ability. However, I disagree that talented people are no longer valued. In fact, modern technology can give them greater opportunities to demonstrate their abilities and reach a much wider audience. Ultimately, long-term recognition is more likely to depend on creativity, quality and the ability to produce meaningful work than on temporary popularity.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5

The response fully addresses all parts of the prompt. You have taken a clear position from the introduction and maintained it throughout the essay. The arguments are well-developed, with a balanced discussion on both the negative impact of social media on artistic standards and the positive opportunities it creates for genuine talent. You support your points with relevant examples, such as the mention of TikTok and YouTube, which effectively illustrate how modern platforms function. The ideas are extended logically, and the conclusion provides a thoughtful synthesis of your position. The response is well-focused and directly answers the prompt without digression.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, starting with a balanced introduction, followed by two body paragraphs that explore opposing viewpoints, and a concise conclusion. Cohesive devices are used effectively and naturally, such as 'On the one hand', 'Consequently', 'Furthermore', and 'In conclusion'. These transitions help the reader follow your argument without effort. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas, and referencing is clear throughout the text. The flow is smooth, and the relationship between sentences is consistently logical.

Lexical Resource — Band 7.5

You demonstrate a wide and flexible range of vocabulary that allows for precise expression. Phrases such as 'mutually exclusive', 'traditional publishers', 'conventional training', and 'long-term recognition' show a high level of lexical control. You use less common items appropriately and with a good awareness of collocation. There are no noticeable errors in word choice, and the vocabulary is consistently sophisticated and natural throughout the essay. The language used is well-suited to the academic nature of the task and contributes significantly to the clarity and impact of your arguments.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 8.0

The essay displays a wide range of grammatical structures with high accuracy. You successfully use complex sentence forms, such as conditional structures and subordinate clauses (e.g., 'even though technically stronger musicians may have spent years...'). The majority of your sentences are error-free, and your control over punctuation and tense usage is excellent. There are no significant grammatical slips that impede communication. The variety of sentence types—ranging from simple to complex—is well-managed, reflecting a high level of grammatical competence that supports the sophisticated nature of your writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.