Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-08-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.

Do you agree or disagree?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is undeniable that, increase in illegal activities for enjoying better and rich life become a pensive concern in this modern world. In this regards, in some countries today, there is an attitude that anyone can do it in the arts, music, literature, acting, art, etc,. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated. I believe that authentic talent countries to be highly valued and appreciated by society explain in forthcoming fragments with a logical conclusion.

To commence with, the belief that anyone can pursue a career in the arts does not inherently diminish the importance of natural talent. Rather, it promotes the idea that with sufficient dedication and training, individuals can improve and contribute to creative fields. This inclusively does not suggest that all artists are equally talented, but simply that opportunity should not be exclusive to the gifted few. In fact, those with innate ability still retain a competitive advantage, as their work often resonates more deeply and demonstrates a higher level of technical or emotional sophistication. The success of naturally talented individuals is still widely recognized, not only through critical acclaim but also through the long-lasting impact of their work.

Moreover, throughout history, society has consistently celebrated individuals whose artistic genius is rooted in natural talent. To explain it, some iconic figures are admired not only for their dedication but for their exceptional innate abilities. This appreciation continues in the modern era, where prodigious talents in music, literature, or visual arts are often elevated and respected globally. Moreover, competitions, scholarships, and specialized institutions still prioritize talent as a criterion for recognition. This demonstrates that while the artistic world may be more accessible, the value of true talent remains intact and is far from being dismissed.

In conclusion, there are several reasons that anyone cannot do music, literature because it requires both literacy as well as professional talent yet according to me the success of naturally talented individuals is still widely recognized, not only through critical claim.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt, but the introduction is problematic. The opening sentence mentions 'illegal activities,' which is completely irrelevant to the topic of arts and talent. This indicates a misunderstanding of the prompt's context. While the subsequent paragraphs attempt to argue that talent is still valued, the initial confusion regarding the topic significantly impacts the overall task response. The position is clear in the body paragraphs, but the introduction needs to be more focused on the specific prompt provided rather than introducing unrelated concepts.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, and there is a clear attempt to use cohesive devices such as 'To commence with,' 'Moreover,' and 'In conclusion.' However, the flow is occasionally disrupted by awkward phrasing and the aforementioned irrelevant opening. The referencing is sometimes unclear, and the transition between the introduction and the body paragraphs is abrupt. While the structure is generally functional, the logical progression is hindered by the lack of relevance in the opening statement.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, but there are instances of imprecise word choice and collocation errors. For example, 'pensive concern' is used incorrectly in the context of illegal activities, and 'critical claim' is likely a misuse of 'critical acclaim.' While the student attempts to use more sophisticated vocabulary, these errors occasionally impede the clarity of the message. A wider range of precise, topic-specific vocabulary would be required to reach a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay displays a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, such as 'authentic talent countries to be highly valued' (should be 'continues') and 'this inclusively does not suggest' (should be 'inclusivity'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of commas and periods. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors prevents the writing from reaching a higher level of grammatical control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.