Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-09-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.
Do you agree or disagree?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
Nowadays, the modern generation is highly influenced by different forms of art such as music, literature, acting and painting. It is widely suggested that anyone can become famous and wealthy globally even with minor artistic skills. Therefore, individuals with real talent fail to get enough recognition. However, I partly agree with this viewpoint because of several compelling reasons.
A key justification for this stance is that the living standards of people have transformed since the introduction of social media. Anyone can become a public figure simply by uploading content on various online platforms including Instagram, Facebook, YouTube and TikTok. A key example of this is that within a decade, many young adults and teenagers have gone viral on social media by making lip-syncing videos of songs. In a short time, they have become popular. Furthermore, they did not get any professional training or formal education for making these short videos. In addition to this, a significant portion of the public is generating a substantial amount of money through YouTube channels.
Contrary to this, many people contend that talented people are not getting enough attention. That is not completely true because there are different fields that still appreciate genuine talent. Although going viral on social media with a single video is effortless, sustaining oneself in the market for the long term requires dedication and perseverance. For instance, the audience on social media can promote a trending song for a shorter duration but traditional companies prefer a person who can work in all circumstances regardless of the platform he is working on. Film directors do not hire actors who can act well in short videos, instead, they choose the person with intrinsic acting abilities.
In conclusion, it is very simple for someone to get overnight fame on various entertainment platforms, even ultimate success needs a person to be an expert. Earning money without any skillset is not a game-changing procedure, surviving for a long run is the ultimate goal.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.5 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The student addresses all parts of the task, presenting a clear position throughout the essay. The introduction successfully outlines the writer's stance ('I partly agree with this viewpoint'), and this position is maintained and supported throughout the body paragraphs. Ideas are extended and supported with relevant examples, such as the mention of social media platforms like YouTube and TikTok, and the contrast between short-term viral videos and long-term industry requirements by film directors and traditional companies. While the arguments are generally well-developed, some points could be explored with slightly more depth to reach the highest band levels. Overall, the response meets all the core requirements of Task Achievement and aligns well with Band 7 descriptors.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay demonstrates a clear logical organization and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct central topic, starting with the influence of social media, moving to the counter-argument regarding genuine talent, and concluding effectively. Cohesive devices are used reasonably well, such as 'A key justification for this stance', 'Contrary to this', and 'In conclusion'. However, there are minor instances where referencing or transitions feel slightly formulaic. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately to structure the essay logically. Cohesion is generally well-managed, supporting an overall coherent arrangement that fits comfortably into the Band 7 category.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
The student uses an adequate and generally appropriate range of vocabulary for the task. There are attempts to incorporate less common lexical items and phrases, such as 'living standards', 'public figure', 'intrinsic acting abilities', and 'perseverance'. While most word choices and collocations are accurate, there are occasional minor lapses, such as 'game-changing procedure' which sounds slightly unnatural in this context. Spelling and word choice errors are minimal and do not impede communication, allowing the reader to follow the argument effortlessly. The lexical range is sufficient for precision and flexibility, reflecting a solid Band 6.5 to 7.0 performance.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5
The writer displays a good mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing relative clauses and conditional structures effectively. Examples of successful complex structures include 'Although going viral on social media with a single video is effortless, sustaining oneself in the market for the long term requires dedication and perseverance.' There is good control of grammar and punctuation overall. While a few minor slips occur, such as preposition usage or slightly awkward phrasing in the conclusion ('even ultimate success needs a person to be an expert'), the majority of sentences are error-free and communication is never impeded. This demonstrates a reliable command of grammar fitting Band 7.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.