Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-09-29
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.
Do you agree or disagree?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In recent years, people argue that now a days anyone can take part in the arts,music, literatture as well as acting in multiple countries.This will lead to that people has no talent has become famous and wealthy due to this talent people ignored and deappriciated.I agree with this statement that everyone become famous over the night. In this eassy we will discuss the main prospectus.
To begin with, we are living in digital era so by social media anyone can become start over the night. Firstly, if we talk about social media platform like youtube there are many content creater who has no talent but they are very famous as well as elitte class people. For example, faimly vloging are the best example because they share their personal like how they are living and how they do shopping. This will result in they become famous and rich. In addition, tiktok is another vital reason where people upload a video about any content, after this they get like and famous. For instance, uploading a dancing video in tiktok then this video viral so, the content creaters pay well according to the highest views. This will lead to that everyone can upload video and it has no selection or merit criteria because it depends upon the tiktok users.
One of the major reason is influencers, in social apps if anyone has many follwers are subscribers they treated as an socail media influencers.For exammple, many companies hired influencers as a brand embesseder of theri products. They do advertisements in their platform and this will result in that the companies get a lot of benifits. These are the several reason that if someone has talent are ignored becuase they has no peoper guidelines and never appreciated.
In conclusion, i believe that everyone can become talented in anyfield over the night and also, it has many drwabacks that talented people disapppointed and they never express their talent in front of world.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response addresses the prompt by discussing whether individuals without traditional talent can become famous and wealthy through modern platforms like social media, and expresses a clear agreement with the statement. The writer attempts to support this position using examples such as YouTube, TikTok, and online influencers. However, the ideas are somewhat limited and repetitive, focusing heavily on social media creators rather than broader artistic fields mentioned in the prompt, such as literature and formal art. Furthermore, the introduction includes a formulaic template ('In this eassy we will discuss the main prospectus') which detracts from natural task development. Overall, the response meets the criteria for Band 5 by addressing the task partially with limited idea extension.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0
The essay displays some organizational structure with paragraph breaks used to separate the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression and logical flow between sentences. Cohesive devices are often used mechanically or inaccurately, such as 'To begin with', 'Firstly', and 'In addition'. Reference words are sometimes ambiguous, and transitional phrases fail to smoothly connect the ideas. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal paragraph cohesion is weak, leading to a choppy reading experience that aligns closely with Band 5 descriptors.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is relatively basic and repetitive, with frequent spelling errors such as 'now a days', 'literatture', 'deappriciated', 'eassy', 'creater', 'elitte', 'faimly', 'vloging', 'follwers', 'embesseder', 'theri', 'benifits', and 'drwabacks'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'influencers' and 'advertisements', but inaccurate word forms and choices (e.g., 'prospectus' used instead of 'perspective') cause strain for the reader. These noticeable lexical errors place the response firmly in the Band 5 category.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The essay features a very limited range of grammatical structures. While there are some attempts at complex sentences using relative clauses and conjunctions, these are frequently faulty, leading to severe grammatical errors like 'people has no talent has become famous', 'anyone can become start', and 'someone has talent are ignored'. Punctuation and article usage are also weak throughout the text. Frequent errors in basic and complex structures cause significant difficulty for the reader, matching the requirements for a Band 4.5 or 5.0, rounded to 5.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.