Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.

Do you agree or disagree?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In today's contemporary world, there is strong belief that anyone can perform well in variety of fields such as music, literature, acting ,art and many more.Ultimately,untalented people gain popularity and become rich.However, people who are proficiently skillled and possess numerous qualities in themselves are not awarded or valued in this era.I firmly agree to this statement will discuss my position in ensuing paragraphs.

Ample number of citizens contend that an average human can perform well in array of activities.Skills like art, music, acting can be done by anyone but if it is a thing of interest of a person then, it contributes a lot to that specific field.For instance,a normal person performing in a competition of art making and simultaneosly a skilled person creates a huge difference.As they are well-familiar to the depth of the art and closeness to it.Another key point is that it is irrefutable to say that any individual can participate in such activity but exceptional knowledge and worth of it is mainly acknowledged by people who really value it.For example, if a person who is expert in music or acting opt to make a career in that stream has it own priority and importance in their life.

It is often claimed that skilful person do not gain fame and image in audience.In contrast,a person who is just average in everything often live a luxurious life due to their name and fame in society.To elaborate, people on social media usually post themselves and inconvenient data which reachesto millions of people due to which their number of likes increases and ultimately escalate their income.Moreover, nowadays people lack knowledge of real talent and often watch nuisances over internet ultimately they enrich their standard of living and become rich.

In conclusion,people should acknowlwdge the real talent and appreciate it as it contributes a lot to the development in different professions of art, music, acting, literature as they consist of their own importance in their field.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the task and presents a clear position agreeing with the prompt. However, the development of ideas remains limited and under-developed, which keeps the response at this level. While the writer attempts to discuss how untalented individuals gain popularity on social media and how genuine talent is overlooked, the arguments lack sufficient extension and relevant supporting evidence. For instance, the discussion on social media influencers ('people on social media usually post themselves and inconvenient data') is vague and does not fully flesh out how this relates to the arts or why genuine talent fails to be valued. To reach the next level, the writer needs to provide more fully extended ideas with concrete, specific examples that thoroughly support the central arguments throughout the essay.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some overall organisation with clear paragraphing, including an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, the progression is not always clear, and the overall flow is hindered by mechanical and sometimes inaccurate use of cohesive devices. For example, transitional phrases like 'To elaborate,' and 'Another key point is that' are used, but referencing is sometimes unclear, such as in the sentence 'as they consist of their own importance in their field' where the pronoun reference is ambiguous. Additionally, paragraph transitions lack smoothness. To improve, the writer should ensure that ideas logically build upon one another with a wider, more natural range of cohesive links, and make sure that referencing pronouns clearly point to their intended antecedents to enhance the overall progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student uses a limited but minimally adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common items such as 'contemporary', 'irrefutable', and 'luxurious'. However, there are noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling that occasionally cause difficulty or read awkwardly, such as 'proficiently skillled', 'array of activities', 'inconvenient data', and 'acknowlwdge'. There are also issues with collocations and phrasing, such as 'gain fame and image in audience'. To move up to the next band, the writer must expand their lexical repertoire, use less common vocabulary with greater precision regarding style and collocation, and eliminate spelling and word-choice errors to ensure smoother communication.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writing exhibits a limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple and moderately complex sentences. When the student attempts more complex structures, frequent errors occur, particularly with articles, prepositions, and subject-verb agreement. Examples of these frequent errors include missing articles ('in variety of fields', 'live luxurious life'), incorrect prepositions ('in array of activities', 'participate in such activity'), and awkward phrasing causing grammatical friction. Punctuation errors, such as missing spaces after commas, are also present. To achieve a higher score, the writer needs to demonstrate a greater variety of complex structures with improved accuracy, producing a higher frequency of error-free sentences that clearly convey meaning without causing difficulty for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.