Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.

Do you agree or disagree?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays,the attitudes of people towards talented people have sparked debate globally. The thinking of people regardind arts, music, literature, acting, art, etc has changed considerably and they hold the view that any one can perform these activities. Due to this behaviour, the ultimated benefits of money and popularity are achieved by untalenteed people, while genuine talent remain overlooked. I completely disagree with this notion. In my opinion, although ordinary people earn benefits temporarily with the help of technology, real talent makes its way in the long run.

One of the the main reasons for the viewpoint 'anyone can do it' is that technolgy is advancing substantially in these fields. With the use of technology, anyone can learn these subjects conviniently and use use them to perform in such fields. Due to this reason, people perceive arts, music,etc compartively easy. For instance, many young singers use autotune in singing and make the song attractive for listenrs. Some of their grab attention of large audience, which helps them to become rich and popular without any real telent.

Nevertheless, genuine talent never reamin hidden from people. The people has the abilily to distinguis between real and fake in the long run. Although ordinay people can do such activities with the help of technolgy, they lack creativity and passion for their work. However, talented people are naturally creative and their work outperform ordinary people at big stages. Nusrat Ali Khan, for instance, was a famous Pakistani singer and his songs were a big hit and cross the borders. He has millions of internation fans even after his death.

In conclusion, people hold a view of anyone can do it regarding artistic fields, dus to which non-talented people get, while real talent remains unappreciated. However, i believe that this mainly because of advacments in such fields and thwb real talent has its value in the long run.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you disagree that genuine talent is no longer valued, and the introduction and conclusion both return to the idea that talent prevails over time. You address the prompt with a relevant explanation of how technology can make artistic performance seem accessible, supported by the example of singers using autotune, and contrast this with Nusrat Ali Khan’s lasting popularity. This gives the response a sound central argument. However, the claim that audiences can distinguish “real and fake” is asserted rather than explained, and the examples do not fully show how talented artists are valued despite short-term fame for others. Develop this contrast with a more specific explanation or evidence to make the argument more consistently convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs present a contrast, and a conclusion restates the position. Linking expressions such as “For instance,” “Nevertheless,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the main stages. The progression from technology’s influence to the enduring value of talent is also logical. To make the organisation more fluent, ensure each paragraph develops one point fully before moving on. Some links are mechanical or unclear, particularly “Due to this reason” and “However” after “Although,” where the relationship between ideas is not precise. The conclusion’s final sentence is difficult to follow, so restate the contrast directly and avoid introducing a compressed or incomplete summary.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “creativity,” “passion,” “autotune,” “audience,” and “international fans,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “genuine talent” and “perceive.” This gives you enough range to communicate the main argument, but inaccurate word forms, spelling, and collocations are noticeable and sometimes distract the reader. Examples include “untalenteed,” “technolgy,” “conviniently,” “listenrs,” and “advacments”; “the ultimate benefits of money and popularity” is also an unnatural phrase. Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than adding ambitious wording. Proofreading spelling and checking whether a phrase is idiomatic will make your ideas clearer and help you use the vocabulary you already know more effectively.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including a concession with “Although ordinary people can do such activities…” and a relative clause in “people hold a view…”. These structures show some range, and the main argument is generally understandable. However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction recur. For example, “genuine talent remain overlooked” needs subject–verb agreement, while “The people has the abilily” has an agreement problem and an unclear article choice. The final sentence, “this mainly because… and thwb real talent…,” is incomplete and difficult to interpret. Practise checking each sentence for a clear subject and finite verb, and review agreement and article use. More accurate control of complex sentences would strengthen the response.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.