Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.

Do you agree or disagree?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

It is a widely held belief that in arts, the concept of "anyone can do it" creates injustice where talented people are ignored over the incapable individuals who earn more. I wholeheartedly agree with this perspective because there is a deficiency of merit in such industries that prefer beauty and promote nepotism.

The most compelling reason to support this view is that there is a concept of having good-looking individuals. To be more precise, organizers or managers only give a chance to those people whom they like in terms of beauty and their overall appearance. A prominent example of this can be seen in the drama industry when directors saw a viral video of a girl who had no talent at that time and had no struggle even though she got the chance in drama. Consequently, it becomes evident that beauty is more appreciated than skills.

In addition to this, another crucial aspect to consider is that of nepotism, in which the children of famous actors, directors, or other celebrities get early and more chances while talented people are waiting for their turn. In other words, it has become a trend that we often see new and inexperienced actors in dramas who are relatives of people with authority. To illustrate this point, a recently released drama showed us a new actor who was the son of the director. His acting was pathetic, so people trolled him a lot. Therefore, it is clear why skilled people are ignored.

In conclusion, I firmly maintained that the many skillful men and women are struggling to get their chance in arts because everyone is entering in it. This is primarily because of the attraction and close connection in the industry.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you agree that people without sufficient ability can gain recognition while genuine talent is overlooked. You address this through two relevant reasons—appearance-based selection and nepotism—and give examples from drama. However, the discussion is not equally developed: the first example of a viral-video performer is vague, and neither example explains in much detail how these practices prevent talented artists from succeeding or how fame translates into wealth. The conclusion restates your view but adds little synthesis. To strengthen the response, explain the effects of each cause more fully and use specific, credible examples that directly support the claim about talent being undervalued.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs organised around separate reasons, and a conclusion. The progression from appearance to nepotism is easy to follow, and signposts such as “In addition to this,” “To illustrate this point,” and “Therefore” help readers recognise the stages of your argument. This meets the lower-band expectations and shows some features of stronger organisation. However, several links feel formulaic, and the relationship between examples and the broader claim is not always made explicit. For instance, after describing the director’s son, explain directly how this limits opportunities for more capable performers. More varied transitions and clearer links between evidence and argument would make cohesion more natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic-related vocabulary, including “nepotism,” “inexperienced actors,” “authority,” and “talented people.” These choices make your main ideas clear, and you attempt more formal expressions such as “a prominent example” and “a crucial aspect.” Some less natural or imprecise combinations, however, limit the precision of the argument: “a deficiency of merit,” “good-looking individuals,” and “get early and more chances” do not express the intended ideas idiomatically. “Pathetic” is also an overly informal judgement for an academic essay. Aim for more precise collocations and a consistently formal register; this will help you express criticism without relying on broad or emotionally loaded wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “those people whom they like” and a subordinate clause beginning “because.” Most sentences remain understandable, and errors do not prevent the reader from following your position. Some grammatical inaccuracies are present, though. In “I firmly maintained,” the past-tense verb does not fit the conclusion; “I firmly maintain” is appropriate. “The many skillful men and women are struggling” is awkwardly structured, while “everyone is entering in it” has an incorrect preposition pattern. There are also some article and number issues, such as “in arts.” Review verb tense consistency, sentence patterns, and article use, while continuing to practise complex structures accurately.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.