Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-28
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.
Do you agree or disagree?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Many people believe that anyone can get opportunity to do something in the art .Art has a various sector and people who have a strong financial background can get the access of doing something from art. I strongly agree with the statement because sometimes talent not get valued and money always wins.
First of all, People who are belongs to a rich family can easily afford anything they want. Acting, music and other field often requires instruments which is costly to buy. Furthermore, several art center teach the children how to dance or how to play instruments and requires admission fee. As a result, student from low income family cannot get enough support or not able to pay couching fees because of poverty. For example, student who have enough support and money get every support and instruction and get chance to perform any event without potentiality.
On the other hand , It is not always money which is close the door of opportunities. One can still get success and become popular with the help of proper support and talent. Tv shows and social media platform help talented people showcase their abilities. This platform allow underprivileged individuals to gain recognition without being healthy.
However, every coins has two sides. Although skills is valuable ,having money makes it easier to succeed.
In my opinion, wealthy people can do anything more easily because they have access to better resources even if they lack natural talent while talented people from the poor backgrounds may struggle because of their financial limitations.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You give a clear overall view in the opening and conclusion: you agree that wealth can make success easier, even when talent is lacking. The discussion of costly instruments, classes and performance opportunities is relevant and gives the reader a reason for your position. However, the response only partly develops the central claim that people without talent become famous while genuine talent is undervalued. The paragraph about social media introduces a counterpoint, but “without being healthy” makes its meaning unclear, and the essay does not explain how fame or public appreciation is affected. To strengthen the response, address both sides of the claim directly and develop each point with a specific, clearly explained example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph about financial barriers, a counterpoint, and a concluding opinion. Linking phrases such as “First of all,” “On the other hand,” and “However” help signal shifts in the discussion. However, the progression is not consistently clear. The sentence beginning “This platform” does not clearly connect to the preceding point, and the proverb “every coins has two sides” repeats the contrast without advancing the argument. Some references, including “this platform,” are also unclear because the essay mentions both TV shows and social media. Organise the body around distinct claims and use transitions and references that show precisely how each example supports your position.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “financial background,” “underprivileged individuals,” “recognition,” and “resources,” which helps communicate the general argument. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate or unnatural expressions make parts of the message difficult to interpret. For example, “get the access of doing something from art,” “potentiality,” and “without being healthy” do not express the intended ideas clearly. There are also repeated general words such as “support,” “money,” and “people.” Build a more precise vocabulary for artistic opportunity and public recognition, and check collocations and word forms when revising. This would make your ideas clearer and more convincing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “even if they lack natural talent” and a concession beginning “Although skills is valuable.” These attempts show some range, but errors occur frequently and sometimes make relationships between ideas harder to follow. Examples include “people who are belongs,” “art has a various sector,” “several art center teach,” and “this platform allow,” where agreement, articles or plural forms are not controlled. Sentence boundaries and punctuation are also inconsistent, as in “art .Art” and “On the other hand ,”. Practise checking subject–verb agreement, singular and plural nouns, and article use, then proofread punctuation and sentence boundaries.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.