Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-29
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries today, there is an attitude that 'anyone can do it' in the arts - music, literature, acting, art, etc. As a result, people with no talent become rich and famous and genuine talent is not valued or appreciated.
Do you agree or disagree?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Student answer (Band 4.0)
Firstly turly talented artists are still highly valued and appreciated for exapmke world famous singersblike adele or painters and writes who win major awared are respected precisly beacause of their exceptionly skillpeople countius pay a lot of money to watch talented actores in films or visit museume to see real masterpieces this shoes that genuine ability is recogized and rewaeed .
Secoundly alotoug social media allowes people with little talent to become temporarily famous
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 3.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 4.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0
You take a discernible position: the opening argues that genuinely talented artists remain valued, and the second point acknowledges that social media can make people with little talent famous temporarily. The examples of Adele, award-winning writers and painters, and audiences paying to see films or masterpieces are relevant to the question. However, the response does not develop the argument or explain whether temporary fame means genuine talent is undervalued. It also stops before completing the second point and does not provide a conclusion. The required minimum of 250 words is not met; at 74 words, the response is substantially short, leaving the task only minimally addressed. Develop both sides of your position with explanation and specific examples, then state your conclusion clearly.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The response shows an emerging structure through the sequence markers “Firstly” and “Secoundly,” which signal that you intend to present separate reasons. The first point also moves from examples of artists to the claim that ability is recognised and rewarded. However, the second point is left unfinished, so there is no clear progression to a final position or conclusion. The first section is presented as one long, poorly punctuated sentence, making the relationships between examples and claims difficult to follow. Use separate paragraphs for your main points, complete each idea, and connect claims to explanations with clear linking phrases. A concluding paragraph would help the reader see how your reasons answer the question.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
You attempt relevant topic vocabulary, including “talented artists,” “world famous,” “major awards,” “exceptional skill,” and “masterpieces.” These choices show that you can refer to performers and artistic achievement, and the meaning of the main argument is partly recoverable. However, numerous spelling errors—such as “exapmke,” “awared,” and “recogized”—make the writing difficult to read, while joined or malformed phrases such as “singersblike” obscure meaning. Some expressions are also imprecise, including “real masterpieces.” Proofread carefully and choose accurate collocations, for example “recognised for their skill” and “works of art.” Building a wider range of precise vocabulary for fame, talent, and public recognition will make your argument clearer.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
There is an attempt to organise ideas using introductory adverbs, and the first point includes a basic cause-and-result relationship: audiences pay to watch talented actors or visit museums, which is offered as evidence that ability is rewarded. However, the response relies on a long run-on sentence with little effective punctuation, so sentence boundaries and relationships between clauses are unclear. The second point is only a fragment, ending after “temporarily famous” without explaining the idea further. Use a mix of complete simple and compound sentences, with full stops to separate claims and examples. Check clause structure and punctuation as you revise; clearer sentence construction will allow your relevant ideas to be understood.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.