Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-08-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries, it can be very difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs, despite their experience.
What do you think are the causes of this problem, and what measures could be taken to solve it?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The most important and very logical theme is to make the country most suitable for development. This needs the very own constitution and rules more feasible and more flexible, so the nation would strive for excellence and become more creative. The underdeveloped countries have more rigid mechanism of employment; they do not have the process of creation of skilled people which focuses on their skills rather than completely depends on the Government. The people having the age of exceeding fifties do not have proper and creative skills which relates to their fields and best possible approach of digital world with better understanding of the innovations in their respective fields. These people mostly relies on the predefined clauses which are very rigid and obsolete ,they usually thinks the best way to solve the modern resistance in unpacked tracks. The mostly relies on single unit, the visual and vision to solve and modifies the complexities are very limited although they have lucid concept of facing and bearing the impractebilities.The fundamental and very basic way forward to deal with these are challenges in any countries is to deal and train the people in dynamic ways, the should emphasize on their skills so the best multiples options would remain open to them in different stages of life. The second finding is that the main hinderance they are stuck in single option rather than getting several different experience.The research work and analytical thinking would be the gateway for solving and creating best appraoch to the people.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response struggles to address the prompt directly. While it touches on the difficulty of employment for those over 50, the arguments are largely abstract and lack clear focus. The essay fails to provide specific causes or concrete measures, instead offering vague generalizations about 'underdeveloped countries' and 'rigid mechanisms.' The ideas are not well-developed or supported with examples, and the connection between the proposed solutions (training) and the specific problem of ageism is tenuous. The response lacks a clear position or structured argument, making it difficult for the reader to follow the intended logic regarding the causes and solutions requested by the task.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay lacks a clear paragraph structure, appearing as a single block of text. There is no logical progression of ideas; the transition between the discussion of 'underdeveloped countries' and the 'way forward' is abrupt and confusing. Cohesive devices are either missing or used incorrectly, such as the repetitive use of 'The mostly' or 'The second finding is that,' which does not effectively link ideas. The lack of paragraphing and the disjointed nature of the sentences significantly hinder the flow of the argument, making it difficult to identify a coherent structure.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and often used inaccurately, which impedes communication. Phrases like 'impractebilities' (likely a misspelling of impracticalities), 'unpacked tracks,' and 'visual and vision' are unclear and do not convey the intended meaning. There is a reliance on basic or misused terminology, such as 'theme' instead of 'issue' or 'problem.' While there is an attempt to use more academic-sounding words, the lack of precision and frequent word-choice errors suggest a limited range that is not sufficient for a higher band score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The response contains frequent grammatical errors that often obscure the meaning. There are issues with subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'these people mostly relies'), incorrect article usage, and awkward sentence construction (e.g., 'the should emphasize on their skills'). The range of structures is limited, and the attempts at complex sentences are often faulty, leading to confusion. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas and periods. These errors are frequent and cause significant difficulty for the reader, preventing the text from reaching a higher level of grammatical control.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.