Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-09-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries, it can be very difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs, despite their experience.
What do you think are the causes of this problem, and what measures could be taken to solve it?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In many contemporary societies, individuals over the age 50 face significant hurdles when attempting to scure high-quailty employment, regardless of their extensive professional background. This issue stemps priamily from ageist seterotypes and rapit peace of tecnologocal advancement, but it can be effectively countered through government incentive and institutionalizd life long learning systems.
The primaily drivers behind unemployment among older demographics are deep-seated corporate baises and technological evolution. Many employers the horber the misconseption that senior workers are inflexible, less adatable to change and lacking to the modern digital competencies. Consequently, compinies often favor younger condidates who are precive the tech-savvy mellable, as to as well cheaper to employ. Furthermore, the considered that the gen-z is well aware the tecnologi and its term and turn. Youth is use the media more effectivily and also sharep its beneficial work.
To adress these challenges, a combination of sate invention and educational initiatives is required. First, should governments introduced robust ficial incentives, such as tax relife of subsides, for busnissess that activily recuit and require employees over 50. This would directly offset the financial tempitition to cheaper, young labour.
In concluion, while age baise and a fast-evoling digital landscape make it exceptionally dificult for older individuals to find sutable jops, targeted solution can mitigates this crisis. By implementing finincial incentivesfir incusive hiring and fostring continous perfessional devlopmemt, socities can fully utilize the invaluable experiences that mature workers offer.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses both parts of the prompt, identifying causes such as corporate biases and technological evolution, and offering measures like government financial incentives and educational initiatives. However, the student's text contains only 234 words, failing to meet the minimum requirement of 250 words. This under-length shortfall negatively impacts the level of idea development and results in a lower score for this criterion. While the main arguments are relevant and clearly presented, the lack of sufficient word count prevents the ideas from being fully extended and supported with detailed examples. Consequently, the response aligns best with Band 5.5, where task completion is hindered by limited development and length constraints.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay displays a generally coherent overall arrangement with a clear four-paragraph structure comprising an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate ideas. However, cohesion within sentences and paragraphs is often faulty or mechanical, as seen in awkward transitions and abrupt shifts in focus, particularly in the second body paragraph where sentences like 'Furthermore, the considered that the gen-z is well aware the tecnologi' lack clear referencing and logical flow. While the student attempts to use cohesive devices such as 'First' and 'In conclusion', the mechanical nature of the linking and instances of unclear referencing restrict the overall flow. Therefore, this performance fits the Band 6.0 descriptors.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The student attempts a range of vocabulary suitable for the topic, including terms such as 'contemporary societies', 'professional background', and 'corporate biases'. However, the lexical control is undermined by a high frequency of spelling errors, such as 'scure' for secure, 'quailty' for quality, 'stemps' for stems, 'priamily' for primarily, 'seterotypes' for stereotypes, 'rapit' for rapid, 'peace' for pace, 'tecnologocal' for technological, 'incentive' for incentives, 'institutionalizd' for institutionalized, 'baises' for biases, 'adatable' for adaptable, 'condidates' for candidates, 'precive' for perceive, 'mellable' for malleable, 'sate' for state, 'invention' for intervention, 'ficial' for financial, 'relife' for relief, 'subsides' for subsidies, 'busnissess' for businesses, 'activily' for actively, 'tempitition' for temptation, 'baise' for bias, 'sutable' for suitable, 'jops' for jobs, 'mitigates' for mitigate, 'finincial' for financial, 'incusive' for inclusive, 'fostring' for fostering, 'continous' for continuous, 'perfessional' for professional, and 'devlopmemt' for development. These pervasive spelling and word-form errors impede communication and constrain the lexical score to Band 5.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The writer demonstrates an attempt at a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing structures like 'In many contemporary societies, individuals over the age 50 face significant hurdles...' and 'To adress these challenges, a combination of sate invention and educational initiatives is required.' Nevertheless, grammatical accuracy is severely compromised by numerous errors, including missing prepositions ('over the age 50'), subject-verb agreement issues ('This issue stemps'), missing articles, and malformed verb phrases ('First, should governments introduced robust ficial incentives'). Furthermore, punctuation and word formation errors are frequent throughout the text. Because errors occur in almost every sentence and occasionally cause difficulty for the reader, this writing sits firmly at Band 5.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.