Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-12
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In some countries, it can be very difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs, despite their experience.
What do you think are the causes of this problem, and what measures could be taken to solve it?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In certain staes, it can be very taxing for individuals aged over 50 to attain good emloyment positions, regardless of their experience. This problem is mainly caused by age discrimination and the rapid development of technology.
First off, one major problem is age discrimination in the workplace especially because they believe that old people are less productive, slow at work and can not handle advanced technology as good as the younger gerneration does. Another reason is that older employees are more expensive to employ and mostly believed to retire soon becuase of their advancements in age. For example, an experienced accountant who is familar with modern accounting software maybe overlooked in comparison to a much younger person with exeptional digital skills.
Several measures could help resolve this issue. Firstly governments should introduce stricter laws regarding age discrimination and should ensure that people are solely hired based on their qualification and not age. Companies that unfairly reject experienced applicants should face appropiate penalties. Secondly, employers should provide them with appropriate training programs to help them develop digital and professional skills. For instance short courses in data management and graphical designig and word express may give them experience and make them more competitive in the job market. In this way no one would look down on the elderly emloyees and the fellow empoyess would aknowledge their skills.
Furthermore, buisnesses should aknowledge the advantages of hiring experienced workers. Older employees often posses vaulable practical knowledge, sound judgement amd strong-problem solving abilities. Companies could also introduce mixed-age teams, allowing younger employees to share their technological expertise while older people provide guidance and mentorship.
In conclusion, age discrimination and davancements in technology are the main reasons why people over the age of 50 struggle to find suitable job opportunities. Goverments should provide fair emplyment strategies and employers should provide suitable training or courses to older candidates.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You address both parts of the question and maintain a clear focus on the difficulty faced by workers over 50. The causes—age discrimination, assumptions about productivity and technology, and employers’ concerns about cost or retirement—are relevant. You also propose several practical measures, including stronger laws, penalties, training, and mixed-age teams. The example of an accountant helps illustrate employers’ assumptions, while the training examples make one solution more concrete. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained: for instance, the link between older workers’ higher employment costs and hiring decisions could be developed, and the benefits of mixed-age teams are introduced without much supporting detail. More explanation of how each measure would address a stated cause would strengthen the response.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, two paragraphs on solutions, and a conclusion. The progression from identifying the problem to proposing responses is easy to follow, and signposts such as “First off,” “Firstly,” and “Furthermore” help guide the reader. This organisation is effective, though some linking is mechanical because several points are introduced with formulaic transitions. Connections between ideas could also be made more explicit—for example, show directly how training counters employers’ concerns about technology, and how mixed-age teams benefit both groups. In the training paragraph, the final sentence about colleagues acknowledging older workers’ skills is somewhat abrupt. Clearer referencing and smoother links between examples and claims would make cohesion more flexible.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a relevant range of vocabulary for the topic, including “age discrimination,” “digital skills,” “practical knowledge,” “sound judgement,” and “guidance and mentorship.” These choices communicate the main ideas and show attempts to use topic-specific language. However, spelling errors and imprecise or unnatural word combinations are noticeable, including “staes,” “emloyment,” “graphical designig,” and “fair emplyment strategies.” Some expressions are also awkward, such as “advancements in age” and “look down on the elderly employees.” These slips sometimes distract from otherwise clear meaning and limit the precision of the vocabulary. Proofreading spelling and choosing more natural collocations would improve control; for example, use “older workers” rather than “the elderly employees” in this context.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “an accountant who is familiar with modern accounting software” and a participial phrase in “allowing younger employees to share their technological expertise.” Most sentences remain understandable, and the range is appropriate for explaining causes and solutions. Some grammatical errors persist, however. In “they believe that old people are less productive,” the pronoun’s reference is unclear; name the employers or companies. The sentence beginning “For instance short courses…” is a fragment rather than a complete sentence, and “as good as the younger generation does” has an incorrect comparative construction. Punctuation is also missing after introductory phrases such as “For instance.” Check sentence completeness, comparisons, and clear pronoun reference to improve accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.