Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In some countries, it can be very difficult for people over the age of 50 to get good jobs, despite their experience.

What do you think are the causes of this problem, and what measures could be taken to solve it?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In different places of the world, citezens over the age of 50 find it hard to get a good job, even though they have more experience. I think the causes of this problem is that the job market favors young people over the old ones. I think to solve this problem, old people should be accepted in positions that honors their experience and should go through some training to learn more about the new additions in the field they applied in.

Firms and corporations tend to accept workers between the age of 20 and 40 with little to no experience, because they are more up to date which makes them more suitable for the job. In the modern world not only your experience and degree matter but also your soft skills.Which makes you more flexible to use recent techniques to promote your field of work.Furthermore, many methods accross different job sectors have changed. For exemple most tech softwares and programs have developed significantly, also in medicine and education different approaches have replaced or removed. This makes the experience of people over the age of 50 rather pointless.

A lot of measures can be taken to solve this problem, the knowledge of older people in certain fields could be used in the favor of the labor market. Govermants can take action to train them and educate them on the new changes of their industry, which can increase the number of talented employees regarding they spent most of their life working in that sector. For exemple, if they teach old engineers how to use the new software they end up with a modern and experienced personel. they can also be used to teach new generations about everything they know.

In conclusion, govermants and businesses could really use the amount of knowledge experinced workers have.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both parts of the question and maintain a clear view: employers favour younger applicants, while training and using older workers’ expertise could help. The explanation that newer methods and technology can make older experience less relevant is pertinent, and the engineering example gives one practical measure. However, some points need fuller development. For instance, the claim that experience becomes “rather pointless” is broad and does not explain why employers might overlook transferable skills. The proposed training is relevant, but you could explain how governments or businesses would deliver it and how it would improve hiring prospects. The conclusion repeats the value of experienced workers without bringing the causes and solutions together. More specific support and a fuller conclusion would strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, one on solutions, and a conclusion. The progression from employers’ preference for younger workers to retraining and mentoring is easy to follow. You also use linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “For example,” and “In conclusion,” and the example about engineers helps connect a proposed measure to a practical outcome. To move further, make the links between sentences more precise and avoid abrupt transitions. For example, “Which makes you more flexible…” is a sentence fragment, and the shift from changing technology to experience being “pointless” needs a clearer explanation. Some ideas in the solutions paragraph are placed together without showing how they relate. Use clearer referencing and develop each point in a more deliberate sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of vocabulary for the topic, including “job market,” “soft skills,” “labor market,” “industry,” and “talented employees.” These terms help communicate the main ideas, and phrases such as “new generations” and “recent techniques” show attempts to express more specific concepts. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or imprecise, including “new additions in the field,” “used in the favor of the labor market,” and “approaches have replaced or removed.” Spelling errors such as “citezens,” “accross,” “Govermants,” and “experinced” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more natural combinations and check spelling carefully; this will make your meaning clearer and help you express the argument with greater precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including clauses with “because,” “which,” and “if.” The main message remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentence relationships unclear. For example, “the causes of this problem is” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “Which makes you more flexible…” is an incomplete sentence. In “positions that honors their experience,” the verb does not agree with the plural noun, and “they spent most of their life working” needs a clearer grammatical construction. Punctuation also needs attention: several sentences run together, particularly around “soft skills.Which” and “work.Furthermore.” Review agreement, sentence boundaries, and clause structure, then proofread for these patterns.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.