Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 4.0)

The chart below depicts the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people live in London think of the city. It tells about the things people enjoy the most about this city.

Overall, they discussed about the range of shops in the year 1 approxiamately around 45 percent of the people found that good likewise in year 2

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0

The opening identifies the survey’s subject and three-year period, and you include one relevant figure: about 45% valued the range of shops in Year 1. However, the report is far from complete: it gives no meaningful overview of the main patterns and omits almost all categories, years and comparisons, including the worst aspects and the problems chart. The final phrase, “likewise in year 2,” does not state the Year 2 figure or explain the comparison. The response is also substantially below the required 150 words: it contains 49 words, with 15 words copied from the prompt excluded. To improve, write a concise overview and select key comparisons from all three visuals, supporting them with accurate figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 3.5

There is a basic attempt to organise the response: an introductory sentence is followed by a paragraph beginning “Overall,” which signals an overview. The ideas are nevertheless too limited to form a clear report progression. The second paragraph ends abruptly at “likewise in year 2,” leaving the comparison unfinished, and there are no developed paragraphs grouping the charts or their main features. The link between the survey introduction and the single statistic is also weak. Plan a sequence such as introduction, overview, and two detail paragraphs, then use clear links like “By contrast” or “Meanwhile” to connect comparisons. Complete each sentence and ensure each paragraph has a distinct purpose.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing survey results, including “survey,” “three-year period,” “range of shops,” and “45 percent.” This shows a basic ability to communicate the topic, but the range is narrow and several expressions are imprecise or unnatural for an academic report. “It tells about the things people enjoy the most” is conversational and vague, while “discussed about the range of shops” is not an appropriate collocation. There is also a spelling error in “approxiamately.” Use precise chart-reporting language such as “the proportion who identified,” “was considered an advantage,” and “rose/fell to,” and check spelling carefully. More varied vocabulary would help you describe the omitted categories and trends.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response contains a few understandable simple sentence patterns, such as “The chart below depicts the results of a survey,” and the opening communicates the general topic. However, grammatical control is uneven in the longer sentence: “Overall, they discussed about the range of shops in the year 1 approxiamately around 45 percent of the people found that good likewise in year 2” lacks clear sentence boundaries and has an incomplete comparison. The phrase “what people live in London think” is also missing “who,” and “in the year 1” uses an unnecessary article. Aim for complete, clearly punctuated sentences and practise relative clauses and comparison structures. For example: “In Year 1, approximately 45% of respondents considered the range of shops one of London’s best features.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.