Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 4.0)

this photo show 2 bar charts and line graphe compare the results of a survey conducted over a 3 year period to discover what people who live in london think of the city.

Overall, it is clear that the worst things about living in london in first year it remain high compared to others years furthermore the best things about living in london almost the third year it has high percentags.

looking at the details, in first year in the best things

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0

The response identifies the topic and attempts an overall comparison, noting that the worst aspects were high in Year 1 and that some positive features reached higher percentages in Year 3. However, it stops after “in first year in the best things” and gives no specific categories or figures, so the charts are not meaningfully described and the overview is too vague to establish the main patterns. The required minimum of 150 words is not met: the response contains 60 words, with 22 copied prompt words excluded. To improve, complete the report and select key comparisons—for example, the leading positive feature, changes in cost of living and crime, and the downward trend in concerns about litter, air quality and noise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 3.5

There is a basic attempt to organise the response: an opening sentence introduces the charts, an overview follows, and “looking at the details” signals a move towards supporting information. This gives the short text a recognisable sequence. However, the final paragraph is unfinished, and there is no developed progression through the three sets of data. The connector “furthermore” does not clearly express the relationship between the two overview claims, while “compared to others years” leaves the comparison unclear. Use separate, complete paragraphs for the introduction, overview and selected details, and connect comparisons explicitly with phrases such as “by contrast” or “while.”

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some relevant task vocabulary, including “survey,” “results,” “period,” “worst things,” and “percentages,” so the reader can identify the general subject. There is also an attempt to use “Overall” and “compared,” which are useful for reporting data. However, the vocabulary is limited and several choices or forms are inaccurate: “photo” is not an appropriate description of charts, “line graphe” is misspelled, and “high percentags” is unclear and misspelled. “Best things” and “worst things” are repeated rather than replaced with more precise terms. Build a small range of chart-reporting language, such as “proportion,” “feature,” “concern,” “rose,” and “declined,” and check spelling and word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts both a simple introductory sentence and a longer overview joined with “furthermore,” showing some effort to vary sentence structure. The intended meaning is generally recoverable, but grammatical control is inconsistent. For example, “this photo show” has subject–verb disagreement, and “in first year … it remain high” has problems with articles, tense and sentence structure. The clause “almost the third year it has high percentags” is also difficult to interpret because its grammatical relationships are unclear. Use complete, controlled sentences and check agreement and tense—for example, “In Year 1, the figures for the main disadvantages were high, but several fell in later years.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.