Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The bar char and line graph depicts the result of survey conducted over a three year period to discover what individuals think about london that which things is best and what is not good about the city and what are significant drawbacks.

Over all around 35 percent people think that the city have all the amenities to live there but most of the people think that its a bad city to live like crime rate is more than the amenities also have bad impact on city like pollution air quality and noise also very bad.

The chart illustrate that 35 percent people think that the best things about london are shops job opportunities different cultures of people and art and museums moreover 25 percent pupils think that night life and transport in three different years is good about the city.But in year one cost of living crime and traffic jam are the worst things in london more than 50 percent people think this furthermore transport and cost of housing are also same about 30 percent people think that these things are awful about the city.

Also these things impacts on city 60 percent people say noise is big problem that remain constant in three years and 65 percent people say yes air qaulity still bad and little decrese but litter is massive problem that 70 percent people say yes however increase in second year but decrease in third year.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The student attempts to address all parts of the visual data, including the best and worst things about living in London and the problems like noise, air quality, and litter. However, the response fails to provide an effective overview, lacking a clear summary of the main trends or significant features across the charts. Furthermore, many data points are inaccurate or poorly interpreted, such as generalising specific percentages incorrectly or confusing categories. For instance, the student states 'more than 50 percent people think this' for multiple items and makes vague references to the figures. This corresponds to Band 5, where the task is addressed only partially, and ideas or data reporting remain limited, imprecise, and under-developed.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response is inadequately paragraph-structured, with a very dense block of text following the introduction that crams multiple distinct charts together. The logical progression is weak, and sentences often run into one another without clear logical transitions. Cohesive devices are minimal, repetitive, or inaccurate, such as 'moreover', 'But in year one', and 'Also these things impacts on city'. Paragraphing is not used sufficiently to separate the distinct survey questions shown in the visual data. These features align with Band 5, where there is some organisation and an attempt at sequencing, but no clear overall progression and faulty or inadequate cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic, repetitive, and limited, relying heavily on simple terms like 'bad city', 'good about the city', and 'worst things'. There are numerous spelling and word-choice errors, such as 'char' instead of 'chart', 'qaulity' instead of 'quality', 'decrese' instead of 'decrease', and awkward phrasing like 'different cultures of people and art and museums'. Less common lexical items are rarely attempted, and when they are, they are inaccurate. This matches Band 5, as the lexical range is limited and minimally adequate, with noticeable errors that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The text demonstrates a very limited range of structures, dominated by simple, run-on sentences joined by conjunctions like 'and' or 'that' (e.g., 'the chart illustrate that 35 percent people think that the best things...'). There is a complete lack of punctuation, with no periods or commas used to break up long, convoluted clauses, severely affecting readability. Grammatical errors are frequent, including subject-verb agreement issues ('the city have', 'these things impacts') and tense confusion. This performance fits Band 5, where a limited range of structures is evident, attempts at complex sentences are faulty, and frequent errors impede smooth reading.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.