Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The bar charts and the line graph illustrates the results of a survey conducted in three years period to discover the opinion of people who lives in London city.

Overall, they describe the most important factors like costs of living and noising and employment opportunities.

In the bar charts, they describe the benefits and the negatives factors. for the benefit factors range of shops are rose more than 40% in last three years, other factors like job opportunities, mixture of people and meseums they are in gradually rising more than 35%, and other factors like transport and night life. also there are disadvantages of this city, for example costs of living, traffic congestion rising very much more than 50% and crimes are rising also more than 40%, and other sectors like transport and costs of living.

Moreover, there also many causess of evaluation, that what the line graph explained, the noising and the air quality are fall gradually in this three years, but the litters was high in first two years than decreased in last year to 75 litres.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response attempts to describe all three charts provided in the prompt, but the information is presented in a very limited and generalised way. While the writer identifies some key features, such as the costs of living and employment opportunities, the overall response lacks a clear overview and fails to adequately detail the data. Many figures and trends are misreported or described vaguely, such as claiming that traffic congestion and costs of living are 'rising very much more than 50%' when the charts show fluctuating percentages. Furthermore, the final sentence misunderstands the line graph data by interpreting '75 litres' instead of a percentage. Consequently, the task is only partially addressed, with underdeveloped ideas and inaccuracies in data interpretation.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The text demonstrates some basic organisation with an introductory sentence and subsequent paragraphs attempting to separate the different charts. However, there is no clear overall progression or logical structure guiding the reader through the data. Cohesive devices are used mechanically or are missing entirely, leading to a choppy and repetitive flow. For instance, the excessive repetition of phrases like 'other factors like' and 'other sectors like' highlights a reliance on basic connectors rather than cohesive links. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal paragraph cohesion is weak, making it difficult to follow the relationships between the various survey categories.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and barely adequate for the task. The writer attempts to incorporate less common vocabulary, such as 'employment opportunities', 'traffic congestion', and 'disadvantages', but these are accompanied by noticeable errors in word choice, form, and collocation. Examples include 'costs of living' (pluralised incorrectly in places), 'noising' instead of 'noise', 'meseums' (spelling error), 'causess of evaluation', and the confusing reference to 'litres' instead of litter percentages. These lexical inaccuracies and occasional spelling slips cause some difficulty for the reader and restrict the response to a lower band level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The student displays a very limited range of sentence structures, relying primarily on simple sentences and basic coordination. Attempts at more complex structures frequently result in grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('people who lives', 'the litters was') and structural confusion ('that what the line graph explained'). There are frequent errors in verb forms and tenses, such as 'are rose', 'they are in gradually rising', and 'are fall gradually'. Punctuation is also weak, with missing capitalization and run-on phrasing. These frequent errors across basic and complex constructions cause noticeable strain for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.