Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The bar graph and the line graph illustrates the outcomes of a test taken over a three-year period to explore what individual who live in the London opin of the town. While there's an report for a university lecturer which explaining the details and the best things for living in london will be share in upcoming paragraphs.

Overall, there are two bar graphs which shows best things about living in London and another on shows the worst things about it, like range of shops and cost of living. Wheras, remaining line graph represents the basic problems comming in London.

As per data, there are several types of best things in London for living, but few are sufficient for attracting towards it, like Range of Shops which may move significantly, as in first year its value was at 45 percent and in the next year it decreased to 42 percent, while in the last year it is noted at 43 percent. Moving forward, next is highly Job Opportunities, which is at 37 percent in 1 year and downgrade to 35 percent, even in last year it is accounted at same like second year. Lastly, Mixture of People, and its value in starting and second year is same at 36 percent, and fall straight to 34 in third year.

In addition, there are three sources which faces some major problems. First is Litter, which started from 70 percent in year one and increased to 75 percent in second year. Shockingly, its value was exceeded and stoped at 68 percent. Next is Air quality, as it begins form 66 percent in beggining year and than decreased slowly, like 63 percent in mid of the year and than reached at 62 percent in the last year. Although, last one was Noise, which blow up from 58 percent in first year and than drop to 57 percent in second year, while by the last year its value noticed at 56 percent.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response attempts to address the visual data, but it only partially covers the complex charts provided in the prompt. While the student mentions some categories from the first bar chart and the line graph, details are limited and ideas remain under-developed. For example, the student selects a few points for 'Range of Shops' and 'Job Opportunities', but omits a clear, overarching overview of the main trends across the charts. Furthermore, parts of the data are misinterpreted or inaccurately described, such as stating that 'litter' stopped at 68 percent when the visual shows a drop to 65 percent. To move to a higher level, the response needs to select and fully compare all key features across the charts while providing a clear overall summary.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is some basic organisation, with the text divided into paragraphs that attempt to introduce, overview, and detail the charts. However, there is no clear overall progression, and the transitions between paragraphs feel mechanical. The student attempts to use cohesive devices such as 'While', 'Overall', and 'In addition', but these are sometimes used inaccurately or repetitively, such as the awkward opening sentence structure. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, making it difficult to follow the logical development of ideas. To achieve a higher band, the information must be organised with a clearer, more logical progression throughout, ensuring that cohesive devices link sentences and paragraphs smoothly without creating confusion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task. The student attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'outcomes', 'significantly', and 'downgrade', but these are frequently accompanied by word choice and collocation errors, such as saying 'highly Job Opportunities' or 'beggining year'. There are also noticeable spelling and word-form errors throughout the text, including 'comming', 'Wheras', and 'stoped'. While communication is not entirely blocked, these persistent lexical inaccuracies restrict the score. To improve, the student should focus on using precise vocabulary relevant to data trends and ensure correct word forms and spelling.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures. While there are some attempts at complex sentences using subordinate clauses, these are frequently faulty and contain frequent errors in grammar, verb tenses, and agreement. Examples include 'The bar graph and the line graph illustrates', 'what individual who live in the London opin of the town', and mixing past and present tenses when describing the survey data ('its value was at 45 percent and ... it is noted at 43 percent'). Punctuation and article usage also show frequent inaccuracies that can cause some difficulty for the reader. To progress, the student needs to develop better control over basic sentence patterns, subject-verb agreement, and consistent tense usage.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.