Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given both bar charts and line graph illustrate public opinion regarding the positive and negative aspects of distinct matter that was conducted over a three-year period in London city.

At a glance, it is evident that the range of shops were consistently dominant aspect of London, whereas, the cost of living, and traffic congestion were recorded as a sever drawbacks over the three year. Additionally, litter was the highest concern through the period.

According to the positive aspects of living London, the range of shops were represented the largest figure over three year, starting approximately 45% in first year and ending at aronud 43% in 3rd year, while, night life showed a gradual increase to 25% and transport remained at the lowest choice, fluctuating around 20%. In Addition, job opportunities and the mixture of people recorded a similar aspect, both showing around 35% at the final year, while museums and art galleries grew steadily, rising from 30% to roughly 35%.

Regarding the negative aspects, the cost of living showed the highest component at around 57% in first year, then it dropped at 50% in finar year with fluctuate. Traffic congestion remained consistently problematic, peaking at 55% in the first two years before falling.

In contraste, transport was the lowest problem over the period.

Finally, the line graph depicts litter was consistently the most critical problem in all three year, peaking at 75% in Year 2 before dropping to 65%. Air quality and noise, on the other hand, recorded a gradual declines over the three years.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover the three visuals and give a clear overview: shops lead among positive features, litter is the strongest concern, and cost and congestion are prominent drawbacks. Several comparisons are supported with figures, such as shops at about 45% initially and 43% in Year 3, and litter reaching 75% before falling. However, some details are incomplete or imprecise. The cost of living was not the highest negative in Year 1: crime was about 56%, just below cost of living at 57%, and congestion was also close at 55.5%. You omit crime’s substantial fall and partial recovery, and do not give figures for air quality or noise. Develop these less-covered trends and make comparisons more exact.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The report has a recognisable structure, moving from an overview to positive features, negative features and then the line graph. Paragraphing helps the reader follow the different visuals, and transitions such as “Regarding” and “Finally” signal changes in focus. Overall progression is clear, but some linking is mechanical or awkward: “In Addition” and “In contraste” interrupt the flow, while “In contrast” introduces transport without clearly identifying the comparison. Some sentences also combine several trends, making the relationships less clear. Use more precise links to show comparisons—for example, contrast the stable low transport figure with the rise in nightlife—and ensure each paragraph develops its main point in a logical sequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of topic vocabulary, including “positive and negative aspects,” “gradual increase,” “fluctuating,” and “consistently the most critical problem.” These choices generally make the report’s meaning clear. However, several word-choice and collocation problems reduce precision: “distinct matter” is unclear, “sever drawbacks” is not idiomatic, and “highest component” does not naturally describe a survey response. There are also spelling errors such as “aronud,” “finar,” and “contraste,” alongside inconsistent capitalization in “In Addition.” Aim for standard chart-report phrasing and check spelling carefully; accurate, natural expressions will make your comparisons sound more controlled and academic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses with “while,” “whereas,” and “before,” and most of the intended meaning remains understandable. Some grammatical errors recur, particularly subject–verb agreement and sentence construction. For example, “the range of shops were” should be “the range of shops was,” and “the range of shops were represented” has an incorrect verb pattern. The opening phrase “The given both bar charts and line graph” is also structurally faulty; use “The two bar charts and the line graph show…”. Articles, plurals and tense patterns need attention in phrases such as “in first year” and “all three year.” Review agreement and article use, then proofread complex sentences to ensure each clause is complete and correctly connected.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.