Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar charts compare what Londoners would regard as the best and the worst things about living there over a timespan of 3 years. The line chart shows their opinions on the major problems of London during the same period.

Overall, people of London view the varieties in shops as the best feature, whereas cost of living and traffic jam are the worst phenomena. On the other hand, they think litters are the major problem of the city.

Throughout the years, most people of London regarded range of shops as the best feature of London and at least 40% Londoners supported this claim. Variation of races and higher job oppurtunites followed as best features with around 35% Londoners resonating with the view. However, fans of museums and art galleries grew over the years reaching the high point of around 35% from approximately 30%.

Initially, around 58% Londoners viewed cost of living, traffic jam and crime to be the worst features of the city. But the opinion on crime declined significantly with respect to others on the last year reaching to 40% approximately. Air quality and noise also decrease

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main positive feature—shops—and the principal concerns, and you include several relevant comparisons, such as the decline in crime from about 56% to 40% and the rise in support for museums and galleries. However, coverage is uneven: the final paragraph stops before reporting the line-chart figures, and the overview’s claim that cost of living and traffic were the worst concerns does not reflect the changing rankings across all three years. Some details are also imprecise: “variation of races” is not the chart label, and the job-opportunity figures are closer to 35–38% than a consistent 35%. To strengthen the report, summarise the litter, air-quality and noise trends and select accurate comparisons across each chart.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview and paragraphs describing positive and negative features. This gives the reader a coherent general route through the information. Linking phrases such as “Overall,” “Throughout the years” and “However” help signal relationships, although some transitions are not fully logical—for example, “However” introduces a rise in museum interest rather than a clear contrast. The final sentence, “Air quality and noise also decrease,” is incomplete and leaves the report without a proper conclusion to its data description. Grouping the three charts more deliberately and completing each paragraph with a clear comparison would improve progression and make the connections between points less abrupt.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for describing survey results, including “regarded,” “declined significantly” and “reaching the high point.” These choices help communicate the main trends. However, some less common expressions are inaccurate or unnatural: “variation of races” does not clearly convey “mixture of people,” “traffic jam” is less suitable than the chart’s broader “traffic congestion,” and “worst phenomena” is an awkward description of drawbacks. There are also spelling errors, notably “oppurtunites,” and “litters” is not the appropriate form for the chart category. Aim for precise chart vocabulary and natural collocations, such as “the proportion who cited” or “was considered a drawback,” rather than forcing elaborate wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, and several sentences are controlled, including “The bar charts compare what Londoners would regard as the best and the worst things about living there over a timespan of 3 years.” The overview also uses a clear contrast structure with “whereas.” Some grammatical errors remain, but they generally do not prevent understanding. For example, “most people of London” and “around 35% Londoners” omit the article or use an awkward noun pattern; “reaching to 40%” has an unnecessary preposition; and “Air quality and noise also decrease” shifts tense and is unfinished. Keep past-tense reporting consistent and check articles and sentence completion. Your range is a strength, while more consistent accuracy would make the report smoother.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.