Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The given bar charts and line graph shows information about the below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in london think of the city. To begin with, what are the best things about living and worst things in London, First categories in first year is 45% and the third year is 42% is the higest range of shops and the the cost of living is first year in 58% and the yar 3 in 50%, Second categories is job opportunities in first year is 38% and the third year 35% worst things in traffic congestion in first year 55% and the third year in 49%, the third categories is mixture of people value is first year is 36% ant the third year 35%,Crime in first year is 57% and year of third 40%, fourt categories is museum & art galleries is value in first year 35% and third year is 30%, the cost of housing in london first year is 35% and the 3 year is 37%, and the second last cate gories is night life is value in first year 24% than 3 year is 27%, whenever transport value is 35% in first year and the the third year is 28%, Last categories is transport in first year is 23% and third year 28%. In addition, These things a major problems in lon

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response identifies several relevant categories and compares some Year 1 and Year 3 figures, such as the range of shops and cost of living. However, it does not provide a clear overview of the main patterns, and the report is incomplete: it ends mid-sentence while introducing the problems considered major. Several figures or labels are also inaccurate. For example, the chart gives museums and art galleries as about 29% in Year 1 and 34.5% in Year 3, not 35% and 30%; crime is about 56% and 40%, not 57% and 40%. The transport figures are confused between the best and worst categories. Select the most important trends, report them accurately, and summarise the litter, air-quality and noise results.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 3.5

There is an attempt to organise the report by moving through categories, using phrases such as “To begin with,” “Second categories,” and “In addition.” However, the response reads largely as one long sequence of figures, with no clear paragraphing or overall progression from an overview to supporting details. The repeated category-by-category pattern makes relationships between the data difficult to follow, and the final sentence is cut off. Some linking expressions are also used awkwardly, so they do not clarify the comparison. Group related information into paragraphs—for example, positive features, negative features, and major problems—and use clear comparisons such as “while” or “by contrast” to guide the reader.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses enough topic vocabulary to identify several chart categories, including “job opportunities,” “traffic congestion,” “cost of housing,” and “museums & art galleries.” This shows some relevant range. However, much of the wording is repetitive and imprecise, particularly “categories,” “value,” and “first year,” while phrases such as “the below show” and “the higest range of shops” are awkward or unclear. Spelling errors, including “london,” “higest,” and “cate gories,” also reduce accuracy. Use standard chart-report language such as “percentage,” “proportion,” “rose,” “fell,” and “remained stable,” and check spelling and collocations. More precise vocabulary would make the comparisons easier to understand.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts to connect information in longer sentences, but grammatical control is weak and sentence structures are mostly repetitive. Errors in agreement and sentence formation appear in the opening, “The given bar charts and line graph shows information,” and in phrases such as “the third year 35%” and “Crime in first year is 57% and year of third 40%.” Articles and prepositions are often missing, and punctuation does not reliably separate the many comparisons. These problems sometimes make the intended relationships difficult to interpret. Practise writing complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, for example, “The proportion naming job opportunities fell from 38% in Year 1 to 35% in Year 3.” Use consistent past-tense reporting and check each sentence for agreement and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.