Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 5.0)

the graph shows the detailed about best things about living in london, in which shops range at the heighest in first year which is 45%, which ie redudec to 42% by second year, but it then again raised to 43% by third year which shows minimal changes. if we look at the job oppurtunities its a bit less than the rang of shops. the job oppurtunities in the first year was about 48% while it goes abit lower to 45% in secomd and third year. there were 48% people from different regions in first and seconf year an it goes to 45% in third year. the museum and art gallery was 30%33% and 36% simulatiously by first year, second year and third year. the percentage of night lifes shows 23% in first year 24% in second year while it was 25% in third year. regarding the trasport its 24% in first year 21% in secomd year and 26% in the third year.

there are the majour proble,s about which the peoples reported was the noise, the air quality and litter which is also noticebale.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response identifies several relevant features of the first chart, including shops as a leading positive and the general stability of some categories. However, key figures are substantially misreported: job opportunities are about 38%, 35% and 35%, not 48%, 45% and 45%; the mixture of people is around 36%, 36% and 34%, not 48% in the first two years. More importantly, the report omits the entire chart on worst aspects and gives only a brief list of the problem indicators, without describing their year-by-year changes. There is no clear overview drawing together the main patterns across all three visuals. To improve, summarise the overall contrasts first, then select accurate comparisons from each chart and support them with representative figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has some organisation: it begins with positive features and then shifts to problems, and phrases such as “if we look at” and “regarding” signal changes of focus. However, most of the first paragraph is a long sequence of category-by-category statements, with little grouping or clear progression. The final sentence introduces the problem indicators but does not develop them, so the report ends abruptly. Connections between figures are also limited, and the reader has to infer which years are being compared in places. Use separate paragraphs for an overview, positive features and negative features, and group related trends rather than listing every item in chart order.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses some task-relevant vocabulary, including “percentage,” “job opportunities,” “mixture of people” and “minimal changes,” so the topic is generally recognisable. However, the range is limited and several spelling and word-choice errors make the report less clear, for example “heighest,” “oppurtunities,” “simulatiously” and “majour proble,s.” Some phrases are unnatural, such as “the detailed about best things” and “the peoples reported.” Aim for accurate chart language and natural collocations, such as “the proportion of respondents,” “rose slightly” and “the most frequently cited problem.” Proofreading spelling and choosing precise terms for categories would make the information easier to follow.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts to connect ideas in longer sentences using “which,” “while” and “but,” and it uses past forms to describe the survey years. However, these longer structures are often faulty, and sentence boundaries and punctuation are inconsistent. For example, “the job opportunities in the first year was” has subject–verb disagreement, while “it then again raised” does not form a clear, accurate clause. Articles and sentence openings are also unreliable, as in “the detailed about best things.” Most sentences follow a similar simple listing pattern, with limited control of more varied structures. Build shorter, complete sentences first, check subject–verb agreement and verb forms, and use commas or full stops to separate each comparison.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.