Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The bar charts and line plot under illustrate the results of a survey conducted over athree year of period to come upon what people who live in london believe of the city .

overall, the variety of shop remainds the most praised feature oof london despite the miror decline while the cost of living and tarfic congestion consistenly ranked as the most drawbacks stable over the period.

the range of shops intially topped starting at near by 50./. in year 1 after droping 42./. year 3 job apportinities and the misture of people followed a similar downward trend both at roughly 35./. and 33./. respectively thereforre conversely museums and art galleries steadily rising from 28./. to approximately 33./. night llife accoridng to the trasnport least popular of london just 20./. mark .

Turning the negatively aspects consistenly rated the worst issue peaking at 75./. in year 2 just droping to following in 60./. in year 3 entire farm work.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify relevant positive features, including shops, job opportunities, the mix of people, and museums, and you attempt an overall summary. However, the report only partially covers the charts: it largely omits the line graph and gives almost no usable account of the worst aspects. The statement that a negative issue peaked at 75% in Year 2 appears to confuse the line graph’s litter figure with the bar chart categories; cost of living was about 49% then, while traffic congestion was about 56%. Several positive-chart figures are also imprecise or unclear. To improve, summarise the main patterns across all three visuals and support them with accurate comparisons, rather than leaving the final chart unexplained.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable report structure: an introduction, an overview, and a paragraph about positive features, followed by an attempt to discuss negative aspects. This gives the reader some sense of the intended organisation. However, progression is difficult to follow because the final paragraph is incomplete and does not clearly identify which category its figures describe. Within the positive-features paragraph, several categories and trends are compressed into one long sentence, while connectors such as “therefore” and “conversely” do not clearly express the relationships between ideas. Use separate paragraphs for the overview, positive features, and negative features/line graph, and make each comparison explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt some task-appropriate vocabulary, including “survey,” “variety,” “downward trend,” “steadily rising,” and “least popular.” These choices show an effort to describe data rather than simply list labels. However, frequent spelling errors and inaccurate word forms make the report difficult to read, for example “remainds,” “apportinities,” “misture,” and “consistenly.” Some phrases are also unclear or unnatural, such as “come upon what people…believe of the city” and “entire farm work.” Build a reliable set of chart-description collocations—such as “respondents considered,” “accounted for,” and “ranked among the main drawbacks”—and check spelling and word forms carefully before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

There is an attempt to use more than simple statements, including a contrast in “despite the…decline” and a comparison of several categories in the positive-features paragraph. However, the range is limited in practice because long sentences are often assembled without clear grammatical control. For example, “the range of shops initially topped… after dropping… job opportunities and the mixture of people followed…” lacks clear sentence boundaries and relationships between clauses. The opening also has faulty article and time expressions (“over a three year of period”), and punctuation and capitalisation are inconsistent. Practise writing shorter, complete comparison sentences first, then combine them with accurate clauses and clear punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.