Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-11-03

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three-year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city.

Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

What are the best things about living in London?

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Overall, the bar graphs demonstrates the outcome of comparison of good and worst things about living in London. The bar graphs ahow the comparison in three different years. Another line graph illustates the survey about these things being the major delima in London.

Firstly, positive things are being illustrated which are range of shops, job opportunities, mixture of people, art and museums, night life and transport. Therefore, the percentage of range of jobs is slightly dropped within the 3 years. Same is the case for job opportunities. However, the percentage of mixture of people remaind unchangeable in the first two years and slightly declined in the 3rd year. The night life in London also little bit increase.

Therefore, the percentage of worst things about living in London is greater. Living cost, traffic congestion and crime rates are at maximum percentages in the first year.

Cost of housing and transport have also negative effects.

Hence, the line graph depicts about the litter, air quality and noise rates because of these things. So, in the first year litter is being increased and is higher in 2nd year. After this it is declined in 3rd year.However, quality of air is being compromised and noise rate is also dropping within the three years time period.

Therefore. we can conclude that living in London has its own pros and cons.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the three-year comparison and mention several relevant categories, including shops, jobs, the mix of people, nightlife, housing, transport, litter, air quality and noise. However, the report only partially describes the data: it gives almost no figures and leaves important comparisons unclear. For example, you say the percentage for the “range of jobs” dropped, although the chart’s category is range of shops, and you describe the mixture of people as unchanged before declining, without noting its approximate values. The overview that the worst things have greater percentages is too broad, and the claim that living costs, congestion and crime were all at their maximum in Year 1 overlooks that congestion was level in Years 1 and 2. Select key highs and changes, and support them with accurate figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic structure: an introduction, discussion of positive features, discussion of negative features and a concluding statement. This gives the reader some sense of the chart groups. However, progression within paragraphs is weak, and several linking words are repetitive or do not show a clear relationship. “Therefore” appears repeatedly, while “Hence” and “So” introduce points that could be connected more directly to the data. The shift from the worst things to the line graph is abrupt, and the final conclusion repeats the general idea of pros and cons rather than synthesising the main findings. Organise the report into clearer sections and use comparisons to link related figures across years.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary such as “job opportunities,” “traffic congestion,” “cost of housing,” “air quality” and “noise,” so the reader can generally identify the categories being discussed. There is some attempt at variety, including “depicts” and “compromised.” However, inaccurate word choice and spelling reduce precision: “delima” is unclear, “range of jobs” misnames the chart category, and “litter is being increased” is not a natural way to describe the figures. Phrases such as “little bit increase” and “negative effects” are vague or awkward for a data report. Build a more precise set of trend and comparison expressions, and check spelling and collocations so that the intended meaning is consistently clear.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including contrast with “However” and a relative clause in “things being the major delima in London.” Nevertheless, errors are frequent and sometimes make relationships difficult to follow. Subject–verb agreement is incorrect in “the bar graphs demonstrates,” and several verb forms are faulty, as in “the percentage … is slightly dropped” and “litter is being increased.” Articles and sentence construction are also inconsistent, for example “the percentage of worst things” and “the night life … also little bit increase.” Punctuation is uneven, with a full stop after “Therefore” and missing spacing after a sentence boundary. Practise accurate past-tense descriptions and straightforward comparative sentence patterns before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.