Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-11-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries these days, the number of people continuing their education after school has increased, and the range of courses available at universities and colleges has also increased.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

People in many countries who prioritising education after school is gradually rising, that results of courses available at university and colleges seems positively affect as it the number rose. I believe as people start to focus on learning more have a positive impact for individual develpment.

As human starts to crave for more information, the best place for them is the colleges and universities. These facilities were build to provide factual and related information for individual development that will suits their special needs according to their major, and as more people pay more attention about it, work opportunities will be given to those have expertise in thier fields to share their experience. Like in agriculture, now a days young people foods are easy to produce, but if they start learning about it and learn how to do agriculture, the benefits will fall down to them as well to our economy. As they will try to find out the best solution to have a best way to promote agriculture and produce products.

In addition, having a people who are eager to learn is beneficial to the economy. We can give example here are the Chinese students in Shanghai that I read in the article, all of their batch invented a machine to help the older people walk easily, it cause less money that is why their government supported it. And it is simple shows that with proper guidance and support, people development will be beneficial to our needs.

In contrast, we know that continuing studying requires a lot of time, effort and money. That sometimes, causing individual to stop. Now a days, some become more practical to work right away because of financial burden and family pressure. For them not being capable to do it, its not laziness, its about survival.

To conclude, as people prioritise to learn more, college and universities are the best place to learn and it is beneficial to the economy, although there are some who cannot do the same because of financial problem, I believe that no matter what we choose to do after school, we always make choices according to what is best for us.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you consider increased participation in further education a positive development, while acknowledging that cost and family pressure can prevent some people from continuing. The discussion of agriculture and the example of students developing a mobility aid are relevant attempts to support the benefits for individuals and society. However, the agriculture example is difficult to follow, and the Shanghai example is presented as a brief anecdote rather than being fully explained or connected to the wider argument. The counterpoint about financial barriers is also less developed than the positive case. To strengthen the response, explain each example more precisely and show how it supports your view, while making the benefits and limitations more balanced and specific.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two paragraphs supporting further education, a paragraph acknowledging a drawback, and a conclusion. This gives the reader an overall sense of direction, and transitions such as “In addition,” “In contrast,” and “To conclude” help signal the stages of the argument. However, some links between ideas are unclear or mechanical. For example, the agriculture discussion moves from learning about farming to finding “the best solution” without clearly explaining the steps in that reasoning. The Shanghai example also needs a clearer connection to the preceding point about the economy. Use topic sentences to establish each paragraph’s main claim, then develop it in a logical sequence with clearer references to people and ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “individual development,” “expertise,” “financial burden,” and “economy.” These choices show an attempt to discuss education’s personal and social effects. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems make parts of the argument difficult to understand. Phrases such as “people who prioritising education,” “work opportunities will be given to those have expertise,” and “young people foods are easy to produce” are not expressed naturally or precisely. There are also spelling errors, including “develpment,” “thier,” and “now a days.” Build a bank of accurate topic collocations and check spelling; prioritise clear, natural phrasing over ambitious expressions.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “as,” “that,” and “although.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main position can generally be understood. However, errors in sentence formation, verb forms, agreement, and articles recur and sometimes make relationships between ideas unclear. For instance, “People in many countries who prioritising education … is gradually rising” lacks a correctly formed subject and verb, while “These facilities were build” uses the wrong verb form. The sentence beginning “That sometimes, causing individual to stop” is also incomplete. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and complete sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check agreement, articles, and verb forms during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.