Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-09-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries these days, the number of people continuing their education after school has increased, and the range of courses available at universities and colleges has also increased.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In many country these days ,the number of people continuing their education after school has increased and the range of course avaliable at universities and colleges has also increased.

In recent year modern society has withnessed a significant surge in the number of hight school graduates pursuing tertair education alongside an expanding variety of academic programs offered by higher learning institution . in my opinion this tread represents a profoundly positive development that benefits both individual carneer trajctories the broader globle economy .

to being with , the expansion of higher education directly correlates with a more skilled and adaptable workforced as industries evolve with technology advancenments the tradition job market is being replaced by highly technical and specialized roles. an increase in the number of university student means that more individuals are acquire the critical thinking and technical skills necessary to thrive in this new environment . futhermore the diversification of course opetion ensure that academic traning aligns closely with niche economic demands in specialized .

In conclsion , the growth in higher education enrollment and the expanding variety of acadim course are highty welcome developments .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response clearly addresses the prompt by taking a definite stance that the increase in higher education and course variety is a positive development. However, the text suffers from a major negative constraint violation: it contains only 188 words, falling well short of the mandatory 250-word minimum. Because of this severe under-length, the ideas cannot be fully extended or supported as required for higher bands. The main body paragraph attempts to explore workforce adaptation and niche economic demands, which are relevant and well-directed points, but they remain underdeveloped due to the premature conclusion. As a result of the unfulfilled word count requirement and limited development, the task response is capped at a Band 5.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The text exhibits some organizational structure, opening with an introduction that paraphrases the prompt and states a clear writer's position, followed by a body paragraph and a brief concluding sentence. However, the overall progression is abruptly cut short, resulting in a truncated essay structure. Paragraphing is faulty, as the second body paragraph is missing entirely, leading to a single massive body block. Cohesive devices are used in attempts to guide the reader, such as 'to being with', 'furthermore', and 'in conclsion', but these are plagued by mechanical usage and typographical errors ('to being with' instead of 'to begin with'). Referencing is generally clear, but the lack of fully developed paragraphs pulls the score down into the Band 5.5 range.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The writer attempts a range of vocabulary appropriate for an academic context, including terms such as 'significant surge', 'tertair education', 'academic programs', and 'niche economic demands'. However, the lexical control is undermined by frequent spelling and word-choice errors, such as 'withnessed' (witnessed), 'hight school' (high school), 'tertair' (tertiary), 'carrer trajctories' (career trajectories), 'globle' (global), 'workforced' (workforce), 'advancenments' (advancements), 'tradition' (traditional), 'acquire' (acquiring), 'opetion' (options), 'traning' (training), and 'acadim' (academic). These numerous mechanical spelling errors indicate a lack of precision and proofreading, restricting the score to Band 5.0 according to the lexical descriptors.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, incorporating relative clauses and subordinate conjunctions such as 'alongside an expanding variety' and 'as industries evolve with technology advancements'. Despite these attempts, the writing contains frequent grammatical errors, such as missing articles ('the number of course', 'in specialized'), incorrect verb forms ('are acquire' instead of 'are acquiring'), and punctuation errors like spaces before commas. There are also sentence boundary issues and fragment-like tendencies in the development. While communication is not entirely impeded and the meaning can mostly be inferred, the high density of grammatical inaccuracies prevents the response from achieving a higher band, placing it firmly at Band 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.