Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-09-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries these days, the number of people continuing their education after school has increased, and the range of courses available at universities and colleges has also increased.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

I believe it is a positive development that could have potential development in indivual and society. increased availability led increase accesibility of continuing studies. every person has various ability, and they are waiting to prove themselves when they facilitate with an opportunity.

Nowadays, the job market requirements are high. looking for a job and get a satisfied package of wages is crucial.

So, the different courses get attention from different people and help them to improve their career goals. few years back we could see the people was struggling to choose their dream job and demonstrate their competence. but, nowadays its a possible matter with the certificates they get from universities or college.

additionally, vocational Training courses emphasis to continue the studies for those who can't make achievements in academics. it also prepare the students with improved knowledge that they are required to do the job effectively beyong the mere training.

women who are taking care their children and having a strict time schedule can choose a course according to their interest and preference. fFor instance, Psychology related courses are preferable for most of the women they can do that within short a period of time and improve their coping ability.

Finally, contuining the studies after the schools is the best idea to build a community with awareness, and personal development. personally, it enhances their overoll life as well as their contribution to better society. the productivity and economic also would have raisen by considering the ideas of delivering courses in various sectors.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear position that the increase in further education and course availability is a positive development. The writer provides relevant ideas to support this stance, such as improved career prospects, vocational training opportunities, and accessibility for women with busy schedules. However, some ideas remain under-developed and lack specific, concrete examples. For instance, the mention of psychology-related courses for women is a good concept, but it is not fully explained with a detailed scenario. Additionally, there are generalisations that lack depth. Overall, the task is addressed adequately, fitting the criteria for Band 6.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear stance stated in the introduction and a concluding summary. Paragraphing is attempted, though some paragraphs lack internal cohesion and smooth transitions. Cohesive devices are sometimes mechanical or misused, as seen in the abrupt transitions at the beginning of sentences (e.g., 'So, the different courses...', 'additionally, vocational Training...'). Pronoun referencing and logical progression occasionally falter, making the reader work harder to follow the connections between ideas. These features align the response closely with Band 5.5, rounding to a Band 6.0 for overall logical structure.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student displays an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'accessibility', 'competence', and 'productivity'. However, there are numerous word choice, collocation, and word formation errors throughout the text, such as 'indivual' instead of individual, 'facilitate with' instead of provided with, and 'economic' instead of economy. Furthermore, capitalization and spelling mistakes are frequent (e.g., 'fFor instance', 'contuining', 'overoll', 'raisen'). These inaccuracies restrict the lexical score, but the vocabulary remains minimally adequate to convey the intended meaning, placing it at a Band 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response exhibits a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but control over grammar and punctuation is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in verb tense, article usage, and subject-verb agreement, such as 'increased availability led increase accesibility', 'the people was struggling', and 'women who are taking care their children'. Punctuation is also problematic, including run-on sentences and missing capitalization at the beginning of sentences. While these errors do not completely impede communication, they occur with high frequency and prevent the text from achieving a higher band, firmly positioning the grammar at a Band 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.