Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Complete Catalyst · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries these days, the number of people continuing their education after school has increased, and the range of courses available at universities and colleges has also increased.

Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In most of the countries nowadays. the number of people continuing their education after school has increased alot, and the limit of courses available at collages and universities increased, so it can be seen as an advantage for the students to choose wisely, whereas it also had some disadvantages as well.

Initially, the variety of courses being taught at university, and collage level has put a good impact on students, about choosing their courses according to their interests, field etc. In addation with the students who continues their study after school were groomed well as compared to the one's who skipped their studies and started a simple job to meet their financial needs. These students have much worldly knowledge about what is happing, they have a high command on communication, task achievement, and team work etc.

The disadvtages of wide range of study courses contain more physicall staff in collages and universities to meet the requirement of students. In most of sectors one teacher who belongs from biological background also teaches students about computer studies, mathematical, business studies etc, this lead to failure in the future. America famous Harvard university researches in the recent year about studying home not going to universities, and collages for studies, upbringing at home consider beneficial for upcomming years.

I firmly believed that studying in collages, and universities will put the greater impact on students grooming so they can talk well have firmly knowledge about everything, exchange of ideas with other students was also beneficial for them in future.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both the advantages and disadvantages of increased post-school education and course availability. A position is presented, stating that it is generally a positive development while acknowledging drawbacks. However, the development of ideas is limited and at times unclear. For instance, the argument regarding the disadvantages mentions that a single teacher teaches multiple subjects, leading to a 'failure in the future,' and brings up a vague reference to Harvard University researching home studying. These ideas are under-developed and lack logical support. While the prompt is addressed, the reasoning wanders into tangential points, limiting the overall task response score.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response is organized into paragraphs, attempting an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, progression is frequently disrupted by poor sentence boundary punctuation, such as full stops used instead of commas (e.g., 'In most of the countries nowadays. the number of people...'). Cohesive devices are sometimes inaccurate or awkward, such as 'In addation with' and 'Initially... The disadvtages of'. Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal logical flow within paragraphs is weak, particularly in the second body paragraph where the transition from physical staff to teachers handling multiple subjects and then to a Harvard study lacks coherence. Referencing and logical sequencing need substantial improvement.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic and repetitive, with several spelling errors ('alot', 'collages', 'addation', 'continues', 'happing', 'physicall', 'upcomming', 'firmly' instead of 'firm'). The writer attempts some less common phrases like 'meet their financial needs' and 'exchange of ideas', but overall, the range is limited and minimally adequate for the task. Inaccuracies in word choice and collocation are noticeable, such as 'put a good impact' instead of 'have a positive impact' and 'firmly knowledge' instead of 'firm knowledge'. These lexical flaws occasionally cause difficulty for the reader.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay displays a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying heavily on simple or poorly connected compound-complex sentences. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including punctuation errors (fragmented sentences with misplaced periods), subject-verb agreement issues ('the limit of courses... increased', 'the one's who skipped'), and tense inconsistencies ('continues', 'was', 'had'). Complex structures, when attempted, often contain errors, such as 'so they can talk well have firmly knowledge'. These frequent errors cause strain for the reader, though the general meaning of the argument can still be deciphered.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.